UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Apr > Apr 19

Don Ecker Quits UFO Research

From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:51:18 -0400
Fwd Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:51:18 -0400
Subject: Don Ecker Quits UFO Research




Source: Kevin Randle's A Different Perspective Blog

http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Don Ecker Quits UFO Research

Word has reached me, meaning that Don Ecker called me, to tell
me that he was quitting the UFO business. He had been around it
for more than twenty years and probably a lot longer as an
interested party. He served as the Director of Research for the
US version of UFO Magazine for a number of years and was key in
exposing some of the biggest UFO frauds. Even when the magazine
seemed to endorse the ridiculous stories of some claimed
witnesses, Don would write companion pieces explaining why he,
at least, was not taken with a specific tale.

In a long paper that he published recently, Ecker wrote:


"One thing that I've discovered being in this field for 20 years
is a very simple truth, but a truth that is most profound. Most
'researchers' are ignorant of what has happened previously in
the field of UFO research. They are ignorant of the claims made
in the past, ignorant of past hoaxes perpetrated by 'players' in
the field and are intolerant of views that conflict with their
deep seated erroneous beliefs. Quite frankly, I've grown tired
of this field.

I'm tired of the media that is blinded by their prejudice about
UFOs, their snide and condescending remarks about something that
quite frankly they know nothing about. I'm tired of people
claiming to be researchers that refuse to accept the truth about
something regardless of how many times it jumps up and bites
them in the ass. I'm tired of government agencies that
continuously lie about a subject that has shown to be something
real and even possibly affect our national security... and
getting away with it for over 60 years. I'm tired of believers
that become upset when their fuzzy illogic is shown to be as
full of holes as Swiss Cheese. I'm tired of frauds and clowns in
this field that are shown to be frauds and clowns and yet still
are treated like they are stars with something important to say.
I suppose you could just say I'm tired of all of it.

20 years ago I thought that genuine study, research and
investigation might make a difference. Alas!! I was most
profoundly wrong! Today (even though I most certainly believe
this is a genuine and legitimate subject of study and UFOs must
come from somewhere), I have had enough! So, this is my goodbye
from the wonderful and wacky field of UFOs. For any of you that,
through the years, have found any of my writing on the subject
to be of interest... thank you. It has been an up and down
thing, this UFO enigma. However, if you are a believer in Bill
Cooper, Mel Noel, Billy Meier, Project Serpo, or benevolent ET's
from the Pleiades here to show us a better way... or possibly
how to build a better mouse trap... preferably a humane one, I'm
sure you will be glad to see my exit... stage right. So with
that in mind I now make my exit. Thanks, because if nothing
else... this has been an interesting but frustrating 20 years."


We see that Ecker's paper tells of his years fighting the
nonsense in the field and of the personal toll that sometimes
takes. Although he doesn't point it out specifically, this
field, like much found in academia, is contentious, with claims
and counterclaims thrown about, allegations of all sorts, and
when that fails, then it moves into the legal arena, or more
often, threats of legal action with no follow up.

I understand much of what Ecker says. I have been threatened
with lawsuits for years and used to count the days in each new
year until the first threat of a lawsuit was made. One year it
was in early January.

This comes with disagreements and perceived slights. Stan
Friedman once complained that in the acknowledgment section of
my first book on Roswell, I had given Robert Hastings more lines
that I had given him. I mean, who counts the number of lines in
an acknowledgment?

But it does demonstrate one of the problems with UFO research
and that is the ego of the researcher. We fight with one another
in the fashion that O.C. Marsh used to fight with Edward Drinker
Cope in the early days of dinosaur hunting. They would lie about
their finds, collect specimens and then dynamite the fossil beds
so that others couldn't find them or excavate them and called
each other all sorts of names. It did nothing to further the
research and hindered it many times. Ufology should look at
these 'Dinosaur Wars' and try to learn from them.

So, in Ufology, we simply smear those with whom we disagree. I
have been labeled, in recent weeks as a liar, poor researcher,
incompetent and a fraud. In the past, I have been called a
government agent and one misguided person even reported that I
had worked with Hector Quintanilla, he once the chief of the Air
Force's Project Blue Book, on some kind of recovery team. Of
course, when Quintanilla was leading Blue Book, I was in high
school, but such facts do nothing to defuse the situation.

To give you a feel for how this works, back in 1988, Don
Schmitt, then the Director of Research at the J. Allen Hynek
Center for UFO Studies, invited me to join them in a project
about Roswell. They planned to look at the evidence and search
for witnesses who might not have been interviewed during the
initial research. Remember, Schmitt asked me, because of my
military background, to assist them. I agreed.

Imagine my surprise in the mid-1990s, when my partner was
telling people that he suspected I was a government agent
planted on him. He refused to supply people with my contact
information when they asked for it and kept convention bookings
for himself, telling the hosts that I wouldn't be available.
This is how it is in Ufology all too often. Partners working at
what turns out to be opposite goals.

I can point to other examples but why bother? The story is sad
and those who have called convention or lecture sponsors to
attempt to steal the bookings know who they are. It can be
documented. It has been but then, no one seems to pay attention
to these underhanded tactics as long as the researcher says what
the people want to hear. Often times the truth gets left behind.

What this demonstrates is simply, as many have said, we eat our
young. We turn on one another so that we can move to the top of
the heap in a field in which the heap is small and so often
ignored. But fight for that top place we do, and this, I think,
explains some of what Don Ecker was talking about in his
article. He has grown tired of the infighting that benefits no
one except the skeptics.

Which leads to another point that Ecker made. He wrote:


"One thing that I've discovered being in this field for 20 years
is a very simple truth, but a truth that is most profound. Most
'researchers' are ignorant of what has happened previously in
the field of UFO research. They are ignorant of the claims made
in the past, ignorant of past hoaxes perpetrated by 'players' in
the field and are intolerant of views that conflict with their
deep seated erroneous beliefs."


The example I think of here is the Mantell case. I believe that
most of the old time researchers realize that Captain Thomas
Mantell, a transport pilot during the Second World War, and who
had just transitioned into fighters in 1947, was killed in a
tragic accident. Mantell, asked to attempt to identify an object
seen over the Godman Army Air Field at Ft. Knox, Kentucky, died
when his F-51 crashed.

We now know, based on the files released by the Air Force, by
the statements of those involved, research by Robert Todd, Jerry
Clark and a dozen others, that Mantell climbed too high and
blacked out due to oxygen starvation. His aircraft, trimmed to
climb, continued upward to about 30,000 feet where the torque of
the engine and the thin air conspired to pull the aircraft over,
into a power dive. The aircraft was seen to begin to break up at
about 20,000 feet. Mantell died in the crash.

The object he was chasing was a skyhook balloon which was part
of a classified project in 1948. Descriptions released with the
declassification of the Project Blue Files seem to confirm this.
The answer, tragically, is that Mantell was trying to reach a
balloon that was at 80,000 feet, way above him.

Today, we begin to argue about the case again. There are those
who believe there was something more here. Mantell was chasing
an alien space craft and regardless of the evidence, will not be
persuaded otherwise. So, we waste more time and effort on a
case, tragic though it was, that is only tangentially connected
to UFOs. For those interested in the full treatment of the case
see:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/updates/

and scroll down to the segment about Mantell. All the
information is there so that the reader can decide if Mantell
was chasing a craft from another world or if he was chasing a
balloon.

Ecker continued in this vein, writing:


"As most reading this will know, Birnes [meaning William Birnes
who is now the publisher of UFO magazine] was co-author with
Phil Corso of the blockbuster The Day After Roswell. However
Birnes is an academic and writer where I was a researcher and
investigator. They began allowing previously verboten BS spewing
airbags into the magazine that in my opinion don't have a clue
nor could they buy a vowel.

So, what are they doing in UFO? Birnes feels that regardless,
all should have a say and then let the public decide. I most
strongly disagree with that position. (For example, there is a
vocal minority claiming that the NASA Moon landings were done on
a studio stage, and the entire Moon Program was a government
disinformation program. Should we give these morons a public
position in the magazine?) If one strives to be the publication
of record in this confusing field, one has to be willing to
separate the wheat from the chaff. As I write this paper, the
most recent egregious example of slip shod editorial decisions
was allowing one wind-bag columnist to revisit one of the
biggest hoaxes in recent memory by allowing the inclusion of the
'Dulce alien base shoot out with U.S. Forces in 1979'! (With
neither Birnes wife especially, or Birnes being aware of the
last 20 odd years of UFO history, this type of egregious error
is routinely made.) This came from the John Lear/Paul Bennowitz
disinformation all the way back to 1987, and has been
effectively shown to be total crap!"


Which means that some, unaware of the history of these stories
will now accept them because there have been printed again
without commentary. The bright spot is that with the Internet,
some will try to learn more and will find the controversy that
rages, though, in my mind, there is no real controversy. We
know, as Ecker said, this is "total crap!"

So, we see that nothing in Ufology changes. We see that old
cases are repeated as if newly discovered and that solid
explanations are ignored because the mystery is more important
than the truth. As some in the news media say, "Why ruin a good
story with the facts?"

Don, I at least, am sorry to see you go. Voices of reason are
too few in this field and the clouds of deceit and confusion far
too many. The commentaries offered by you put some of this into
perspective and now we've lost that. I hope that, at some point,
you'll return and that we'll have another voice for reason
because, without that, the bad guys win.

(Note: In the latest issue of UFO they only report that both Don
and Vicki Ecker have decided to retire from the field...)


[Thanks to Stuart Miller of http://uforeview.net/ for the lead]



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com