UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Apr > Apr 20

Re: The Roswell Incident - The True Story - Kaeser

From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 17:46:39 -0400
Fwd Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:54:44 -0400
Subject: Re: The Roswell Incident - The True Story - Kaeser

>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 14:05:00 EDT
>Subject: Re: The Roswell Incident - The True Story

>>From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:11:15 -0400
>>Subject: Re: The Roswell Incident - The True Story


>Good Day All,

>If I might step in here. I had several interviews with Cavitt
>including one at his winter residence in Sierra Vista and two at
>his home in Washington State. He told me, in order, that he
>hadn't been in Roswell in early July 1947, that he had been
>assigned to the base there but hadn't arrived yet and finally
>that he was there but that he didn't go out on any recovery of a

>You can read Cavitt's interview with Weaver in the Air Force
>produced The Roswell Report beginning in Section 18 and is dated
>24 May 1994. In it you can read how Cavitt explains that he
>recognized the material on the ranch as a weather balloon when
>he first saw it but doesn't explain why he didn't mention this
>to either Marcel or to COL Blanchard so they could have avoided
>the embarrassment of announcing they had a flying saucer.

>You can also read how there were no checkpoints out there though
>others have talked about them. In fact, you can read how Cavitt
>disagrees with nearly everyone who has talked about the case in
>some fashion.

>So, Cavitt is on the record, in several places, but his stories
>change as the mood moves him.

Hi Kevin,

I stand corrected by someone that I admire, and it didn't hurt a
bit.... <g>. I was typing from memory at work, but didn't recall
that Cavitt acknowledged very much to Weaver.

Your post from Don Ecker is reflected in some of the discussion
we have on the subject of Roswell. Someone once said "If you
torture the data long enough, it will confess to whatever you
want it to", and that seems to be what is going on in most of
ufology today (IMO). If any case has been researched to death,
it's the "Roswell" incident, and certainly all of the data
gathered and combined would be internally inconsistent. I would
like to hope for a breakthrough or admission, but neither is


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com