|
From: Jason Gammon <BoyintheMachine.nul> Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 01:09:54 EDT Archived: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 21:31:28 -0400 Subject: Re: The ETH >From: Ed Gehrman <egehrman.nul> >To: <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:00:40 -0700 >Subject: Re: The ETH >>From: Jason Gammon <BoyintheMachine.nul> >>To: ufoupdates.nul >>Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:49:28 EDT >>Subject: Re: The ETH [was: Why The Cover-Up?] >>>From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul> >>>To: ufoupdates.nul >>>Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 10:54:02 EDT >>>Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up? >>>Again, the ETH is only a valid hypothesis if one has the mindset >>>that we mere humans know everything there is about the planet >>>Earth, physics and a dozen or more physical sciences. ><snip> >>Greg, you are not getting it. There is no proof that the UFO >>Phenomena is in fact Extraterrestrial. Instead, the ETH >>represents an example of Intelligent Speculation. >>The notion that an advanced race not only coexists with us >>undetected here on the planet, but actually evolved here, makes >>absolutely no sense. >What are your specific objections? Do you understand and/or have >a problem with convergent evolution? My objection Ed, is that you have created a scenario more suited for a Sci-fi channel Saturday night movie, than what the current evidence suggests. All we know for sure is that a technology currently unreached by man is being displayed. You take this and leap into territory many will not venture. >Are the time spans a >problem? Do you understand my argument that tool making is a >niche and has led to our general appearance or after successful >tool making experience, these hominids could have vacated earth >because it was undergoing vast change? Please help me understand >why you can't make "sense" of this hypothesis. I want you to try >and poke holes in my theory; insults don't count. You can't poke holes in a ghost, Ed. Flesh out a true theory based on logic and I might support it. >>Such a belief is not only an example of Unintelligent >>Speculation, but also of the wild, tabloid variety. >But to call it "unintelligent" without a crumb of evidence as to >why you feel this way, is a great example of unintelligent >criticism. >Ed I'll give you that Ed, it does take intelligence to be imaginative. What you seem to be lacking is logic. -Jason Gammon Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast See: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp