UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Aug > Aug 13

Re: Crop Circles To Be Debated

From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:27:06 -0400
Archived: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 08:47:29 -0400
Subject: Re: Crop Circles To Be Debated

>From: Paul Scott Anderson <paulscottanderson.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 09:52:09 -0700
>Subject: Re: Crop Circles To Be Debated

>>From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:58:42 -0400
>>Subject: Re: Crop Circles To Be Debated

>>If a summary of physical evidence exists, please point us to it.
>>This would have been more useful than the opinion, "There is no
>>unexplained activity in Wiltshire".

>The BLT Research Team web site:


>I also have a summary of scientific evidence (including some
>specifically Canadian) on the CCCRN web site:


I realise that good analyses of some crop formations have been
done, and the sources cited give examples of that. These are
sufficient to establish that some sophisticated technology has
been applied, and that's good. However, for other objectives, we
need information about whether or not each formation made since,
say, 1992 is man-made. For example, before we can attempt to
understand the meaning of the formations as a whole, we need to
be able to filter out the noise.

Information to help make a judgement about all known formations
might exist in the files of the various groups involved. One
might at least estimate a probability that each formation is
man-made based on the available evidence. However, I've been
told that information is not shared easily among groups for a
number of reasons, including lack of resources.


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast