UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Aug > Aug 22

Re: Brad Sparks' 'Forthcoming' Roswell Revelations?

From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:37:49 EDT
Archived: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 11:00:39 -0400
Subject: Re: Brad Sparks' 'Forthcoming' Roswell Revelations?


>From: Richard Hall <hallrichard99.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:43:31 +0000
>Subject: Re: Brad Sparks' 'Forthcoming' Roswell Revelations?

>>From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 22:19:31 EDT
>>Subject: Re: Brad Sparks' 'Forthcoming' Roswell Revelations?

>>>From: Anthony Bragalia <envcol.nul>
>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 20:01:28 -0400
>>>Subject: Brad Sparks 'Forthcoming' Roswell Revelations?

>>>Brad Sparks MUFON Symposium Proceedings paper on MJ-12
>>>hints at tantalizing and potentially very valuable new Roswell
>>>information. He is very brief in these revelations, which could
>>>easily go unnoticed without careful reading. Perhaps Brad may
>>>speak more directly to them here. To my knowledge this
>>>information has never been mentioned or published by any other
>>>researcher.

>>I think that is correct, no other researcher has ever mentioned
>>or published anything like this. The skeptics will not tolerate
>>anything but a Mogul balloon. Roswell proponents will not
>>tolerate anything less than alien bodies and crashed spaceship.
>>Even something like "possibly extraterrestrial" is not good
>>enough for them. It can be right in front of their eyes and they
>>cannot see it.

>>Anything in between a Mogul balloon and an ET spacecraft is
>>completely invisible to skeptics and advocates alike, they
>>cannot see any evidence that falls in between even if they
>>should happen to come across it (as a few have), they will not
>>look for such evidence, and with virtually no exceptions they
>>will not help anyone else (such as me) look for such "in
>>between" evidence.

>These gratuitous insulting characterizations of other
>researchers are so much egocentric nonsense, Brad. You throw out
>more hints and teases than a...well, choose your own analogy.

I just answered someone's questions so you don't need to butt in
if you don't like the answers.

I suggest that the Roswell methodology of the past 30 years has
led absolutely nowhere but to dead-ends and you go ballistic
with name-calling about so-called "insulting" and "egocentric
nonsense." If you have a better Roswell investigative
methodology that doesn't lead to dead-ends let's hear it Dick
and leave the snide ad hominems out of it.

These are facts which you are calling "insulting" and
"egocentric nonsense" and which has taken me 6 years to overcome
- see that part of my post about how the refusal to see anything
in between a Mogul balloon and an ET spaceship also results in
refusal to help anyone dig up evidence that may _seem_ to fall
in between Mogul and ET (as say with me the past 6 years when no
one previously would help).

>First you produce some evidence, then we look at it, then we
>decide how meaningful it is and how to interpret it. Only Brad
>Sparks is open-minded and only Brad Sparks has the correct road
>to truth?

Only Dick Hall is "open-minded" and has "the correct road to
truth"? Where has it led us Dick with Roswell the past 30 years?
If you are so "open-minded" then why can't you comprehend Karl
Pflock's middle option, a Roswell extraterrestrial "anomaly" in
between Mogul and ET?

No I'm sorry but it is a _fact_ that Roswell investigations to
date are a dead-end. Prove me wrong with a slew of leads
actually leading somewhere besides Roswell, New Mexico. In the
extremely rare instance of an air bus-driver who purportedly
transported a national secret and of course was told all about
it even though just a transport pilot - got to peek under the
tarp and all that typical lying Roswell bulls-t I'm so sick of
reading - even in those few rare instances they lead to dead-
 ends, too.

How many years do you get to keep making the same mistake over
and over again using the same fruitless Roswell methodology
before someone blows the whistle and says "Hey! This isn't
working people!"

And no Dick I won't "produce some evidence" to compromise the
ongoing investigation - which has taken me 6 years to get under
way because of the hardened attitudes of those who cannot
tolerate anything in between a full-fledged ET spaceship with
alien bodies and a Mogul balloon. I have had only a few months
finally getting the assistance I've needed. You've had 30 years.




Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com