UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Aug > Aug 24

Re: Brad Sparks' 'Forthcoming' Roswell Revelations?

From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:55:57 -0400
Archived: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:02:25 -0400
Subject: Re: Brad Sparks' 'Forthcoming' Roswell Revelations?

>From: Rick Nielsen <nilthchi.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
>Subject: Re: Brad Sparks' 'Forthcoming' Roswell Revelations?


>I'd like to butt in...

>This field is fraught with frustrations, isn't it? The UFO
>pilots aren't forthcoming.

>But we do know that 'they' are in our skies. We know that 'they'
>have been flying for decades at least. Those UFOs have been
>happening without credible humanity taking credit for it.

>The best way to move this study forward is to include open peer
>review, with as little belittling as possible. Dick Hall has his
>place, as does Brad Sparks. And so does everyone else.

>Thanks to EBK, for keeping us all in touch!

While Errol has his critics, I also believe this List is a
valuable forum for many of us to review current thoughts and

I'm not sure what you mean by "open peer review", and who you
would expect to perform that "review" (or more importantly how
much expertise they would have to properly review the facts and
proposed theories). Open peer review by Internet posters in
general isn't helpful, and I think we're at the point of
disagreement over who is an "expert" in the field. I notice that
you didn't use the word 'science' in your suggestion, and I
sense that many are too frustrated with the limitations imposed
by the scientific analysis.


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast