From: Stan Friedman <fsphys.nul>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 11:34:31 -0300
Archived: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:39:47 -0400
Subject: Re: New Revelations On Origins Of MJ-12


>From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:21:08 EDT
>Subject: Re: New Revelations On Origins Of MJ-12

>>From: Mary Castner <m.castner.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:46:01 -0500
>>Subject: Re: New Revelations On Origins Of MJ-12

<snip>

>The point still remains that the MJ-12 Eisenhower Briefing is
>identified in the Pratt files as "the original Aquarius
>document" - with its absurd Jesus-was-an-alien hogwash - in
>1981-2, three years before the Eisenhower document ever showed
>up in Shandera's mailbox in 1984, regardless of who hoaxed it or
>why.

<snip>

Brad

I find it quite extraordinary that it can be claimed, apparently
with a straight face, that The EBD is "the original Aquarius
document" with its absurd Jesus-was-an-alien hogwash... When
there is no mention of JC in the EBD.

Equally extraordinary in Brad's MUFON paper is the claim that
the Cutler Twining memo is an emulation of a memo found earlier
at the Library Of Congress Manuscript Division by Moore and
myself, when the only similarity is the last sentence which is a
standard clause indicating that if all is OK, no response
necessary. The use of this strange bit (nothing else matches) is
an indication of genuiness not fraud.

Both are in my Final Report On Operation Majestic 12, listed on
my Website at:

http://www.stantonfriedman.com


Stan Friedman




Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/