|
From: Paul Scott Anderson <paulscottanderson.nul> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:13:36 -0700 Archived: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:00:36 -0400 Subject: Re: Crop Circles Discussion >From: Kentaro Mori <kentaro.mori.nul> >To: ufoupdates.nul >Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 06:26:46 -0300 >Subject: Re: Crop Circles Discussion >The much referenced work of the BLT team is sometimes touted as >objective evidence, but one must note many things, among others >that they always advance the plasma vortex hypothesis, even for >complex formations (which Terence Meaden himself argued against) >and make use of strange methodology. The plasma vortex idea is _not_ always advanced, although it is still considered possible by some of the people involved (but it was primarily Levengood and I would just remind people that Levengood hasn't even been part of BLT for a number of years now). The criticisms of methodology have always been with Levengood; there are, as I've said before, a growing number of scientists involved in the studies now with a wide variety of testing done: http://www.bltresearch.com/proffcons.html http://www.bltresearch.com/xrd.html http://www.bltresearch.com/published.html http://www.bltresearch.com/labreports.html The critics should realize that a lot has changed since the 90s and any criticisms of the new work being done should be based on the published results only, not just perpetuating the old Levengood debate... Paul Scott Anderson Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast See: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp