UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Dec > Dec 8

Re: The Arnold Case - Solved?

From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 00:51:04 -0500
Archived: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 01:18:25 -0500
Subject: Re: The Arnold Case - Solved?

>From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:08:15 -0600
>Subject: Re: The Arnold Case - Solved?

>>From: John Rimmer <j.rimmer.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 00:44:59 +0000
>Subject: The Arnold Case - Solved?

>>>Any comments on this? It does come from a pilot, and so,
>>>according to Don Ledger, speaks with extra authority!

>Wow, John, pretty impressive.

>A vague anecdote drawn up from fallible memory, no real cited
>source - can you imagine what you would have done if somebody
>had put this forward in a pro-UFO, as opposed to pelicanist,

>Oh, excuse me, I forgot. One standard for UFO proponents,
>another for pelicanists. Never mind.

>This to Bruce Maccabee: I know you've been counting, so perhaps
>you can answer this question: What number explanation is this
>for the Arnold sighting? Are we in three figures by now?

As I pointed out in my earlier email response directly to
Rimmer, I consider this to be a variant of the Hynek
explanation: Hynek didn't specify the type of aircraft, just
that it was a large aircraft about 6 miles in front of Arnold,
if I recall correctly (and flying about 400 mph).

This 'explanation' merely specifies the type of aircraft.

So If Hynek's explanation is #1A, this is #1B.

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com