UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Dec > Dec 11

Re: Pilots' Out-Of-Body Experiences

From: Nick Balaskas <Nikolaos.nul>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:08:05 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
Archived: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:02:22 -0500
Subject: Re: Pilots' Out-Of-Body Experiences

>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:47:30 -0400
>Subject: Re: Pilots' Out-Of-Body Experiences

>>From: Nick Balaskas <nikolaos.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 22:16:59 -0500
>>Subject: Re: Pilots' Out-Of-Body Experiences

>>>From: Joe McGonagle <joe.mcgonagle.nul>
>>>Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 18:31:16 +0000
>>>To: uup <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Subject: Pilots' Out-Of-Body Experiences

>>>[I think the final paragraph of this article is particularly
>>>superfluous! - Joe]

>>>Source: The Daily Mail  London, UK



>>>Pilots' 'out-of-body experiences' responsible for more than a
>>>quarter of fatal air crashes


>>My pilot friend didn't think JFK Jr had an SD problem either.
>>Although JFK Jr was an experienced and cautious pilot, and his
>>aircraft was well equipped with instruments, my friend told me
>>that he was flying nearby during that same time period JFK Jr's
>>aircraft went down and remembers that the visibility was lousy.
>>Also, having two women in the aircraft could well have caused an
>>added distraction.

>>In support of my suspicions of foul play, my pilot friend did
>>say he heard a report that someone near the destination Kennedy
>>was trying to reach, either heard an explosion, saw a flash of
>>light through the haze above him, or both.

>Bull pucky. Kennedy Jr. was a 300 hour pilot with no night
>rating let alone an instrument rating flying a 200mph Piper that
>he basically had about 100 hours of flight time on. He got
>behind it in haze over water at dusk while flying to Martha's
>Vinyard. He went into a spiral, lost a wing and impacted the
>water at 60mph - his Air Speed Indicator, ASI, showed "witness
>marks" on the instruments face at that speed. The wreck clearly
>showed there was no explosion. A large portion of one wing was
>found a good distance away indicating wing separation. He had
>the necessary instruments onboard to fly without a horizon as a
>reference but didn't have the training to do so.


>No conspiracy here just classic symptoms of inexperience, the
>time of day, no IFR training, his training was behind the
>airplane's capabilitiy [200mph] an urge to complete the mission,
>bad weather and SD. Most times it takes about three things piling
>up - it's called cascading events - to "get you", Kennedy had 7.

Bullpucky, not! In WWII the allied pilots and flight crews that
flew the large bombers loaded to capacity with bombs to distant
tragets they never visited or even heard of before, often under
the cover of darkness and clouds, didn't have much more actual
flying experience than Kennedy Jr had.

When I was learning to fly in a Cessna 172, my instructor put
the plane in a spin and a spiral so that I could distinguish
between the two and be able to recover from them. When I
expressed concerns that such violent moves may rip the plane's
wings off, my instructor, who also did aerobatics, reassured me
that this was impossible. Of course if my wing support strut was
tampered with, this would explain why JFK Jr's wing was found a
good distance away as you say.

According to another interpretion of what happened that is based
on witness testimony, not like yours which is based simply on
the official account (and we know just how unreliable these can
be when it comes to UFO incidents!) there apparently was an
explosion. A reporter for the Vineyard Gazette newspaper told
WCVB-TV in Boston that he was out walking Friday night about the
time of the crash and saw "big white flash in the sky" off
Philbin Beach (see URL below).


According to this same URL, visibility at the time was reported
to be 8 miles, clear enough to fly without instruments. If these
claims are correct, then it could not have been any one of your
7 things - or all of them combined - that led to this fatal
crash (which I suspect was an assassination of another Kennedy
and another attack on freedom in America).

Ignoring or discounting any eyewitness testimony because it
conflicts with the official account does not help in our search
for the truth but it does serve the goals of debunkers who don't
want us to give further attention to something important, such
as UFOs and other cover-ups.

Nick Balaskas

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com