UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Dec > Dec 31

Re: Oddity In Chandler & Buran's Rendlesham

From: Lan Fleming <lfleming5.nul>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:51:54 -0600
Archived: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:21:16 -0500
Subject: Re: Oddity In Chandler & Buran's Rendlesham

>From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:50:22 EST
>Subject: Re: Oddity In Chandler & Buran's Rendlesham Statements

>>From: Lan Fleming <lfleming5.nul>
>>To: UFO UpDates <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:10:10 -0600
>>Subject: Oddity In Chandler & Buran's Rendlesham Statements


>It is just standard legalese found in many places in the legal
>world! It is apparently used by interrogators to 'prove' they
>did not beat the confession out of a suspect, etc., because the
>suspect states of his own 'free will' (skipping theological and
>philosophical arguments over whether free will exists) that he
>was not coerced, unlawfully induced or influenced, etc.

Thanks, Brad. I kind of thought that something like that was the
case but it seemed worth asking about. The "legal world" is
indeed an alien planet.

>These were AF Military Police and these were obviously the
>standard AF forms they used every day and had lying around in
>some quantities so they used them to write up their UFO incident
>narratives. I don't see what the big deal is here.

>I have already proven in other posts that false statements had
>been made about a fruitless "2 mile lighthouse chase" - not
>physically possible for 1.9 miles of any 2-mile trek hence are
>outright lies - most probably inserted or 'influenced' or coerced
>into the Cabansag and Burroughs statements. This was proven on
>the basis of absolutely conclusive physical facts, not
>subjective opinions.

That's certainly more important than all the back and forth
about trying to get into the witnesses' heads to discern whether
they were lying in their later statements to acquire fame &

Is it true that these written statements were taken at Halt's
request? If they did lie about the 2-mile lighthouse chase, it
would seem very strange if Halt or his subordinates were
responsible for coercing them into lying about it!

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com