From: Daniel Brenton <daniel_brenton.nul> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:13:19 -0800 Fwd Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 07:16:17 -0500 Subject: Re: The Andreasson Affair A Hoax - Brenton >From: Robert Luca <lucaland.nul> >To: <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:12:49 -0500 >Subject: The Andreasson Affair A Hoax >The Andreasson Affair can be taken for what it is. >A HOAX! Let me first state that I don't know the Andreasson-Lucas personally, though I have long followed the story of The Andreasson Affair. I personally am not going to automatically dismiss the story because of this claim, and clearly I feel strongly enough about it that I'm willing to make the following comments. I find this disturbing, and further, I would hope no one would buy-in to what Robert Jr. is saying without a hard look and a balanced discussion. I have been close to several broken marriages and broken families and see the incredibly spiteful things that can occur in the aftermath of divorce. It's usually real Jerry Springer stuff, and it seems rare that marriages can end in amicable partings. I will argue his assertion that a compulsive liar would evade the discussion. I don't think that's true. My experience of compulsive liars is that they delight in spinning any negative attention to their advantage. I don't see this happening yet. Compulsive liars stop lying when they're dead, and not a moment before. If I really wanted to hurt someone who has gone on record as an abductee - and my conscience wasn't an issue - I'd attack the validity of their reported experiences. An absurdly easy target. After all, these people are crazy and can't prove anything, right? I credit the Andreasson-Lucas and Raymond Fowler for not jumping into this 'discussion'.
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp