UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Feb > Feb 12

Re: The Andreasson Affair A Hoax - Hall

From: Richard Hall <hallrichard99.nul>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:46:49 +0000
Fwd Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 19:52:14 -0500
Subject: Re: The Andreasson Affair A Hoax - Hall

>From: Daniel Brenton <daniel_brenton.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 14:13:19 -0800
>Subject: Re: The Andreasson Affair A Hoax

>>From: Robert Luca <lucaland.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 17:12:49 -0500
>>Subject: The Andreasson Affair A Hoax

>>The Andreasson Affair can be taken for what it is.

>Let me first state that I don't know the Andreasson-Lucas
>personally, though I have long followed the story of The
>Andreasson Affair. I personally am not going to automatically
>dismiss the story because of this claim, and clearly I feel
>strongly enough about it that I'm willing to make the following

>I find this disturbing, and further, I would hope no one would
>buy-in to what Robert Jr. is saying without a hard look and a
>balanced discussion. I have been close to several broken
>marriages and broken families and see the incredibly spiteful
>things that can occur in the aftermath of divorce. It's usually
>real Jerry Springer stuff, and it seems rare that marriages can
>end in amicable partings.

>I will argue his assertion that a compulsive liar would evade
>the discussion. I don't think that's true. My experience of
>compulsive liars is that they delight in spinning any negative
>attention to their advantage. I don't see this happening yet.

>Compulsive liars stop lying when they're dead, and not a moment

>If I really wanted to hurt someone who has gone on record as an
>abductee - and my conscience wasn't an issue - I'd attack the
>validity of their reported experiences. An absurdly easy target.
>After all, these people are crazy and can't prove anything,

>I credit the Andreasson-Lucas and Raymond Fowler for not jumping
>into this 'discussion'.

Very good observations, Daniel. I'm with you. We need a balanced
discussion, and cannot leap to the conclusion that this guy's
motives or intentions are simon pure and that he is telling the
plain truth. He could have an ax to grind. Maybe so, maybe not.
But the important thing is to have a fair hearing.

 - Dick

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com