UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Feb > Feb 15

Re: Great Debate About Frequency Of ET Life -

From: Stuart Miller <stuart.miller4.nul>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:40:59 +0000 (GMT)
Fwd Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:13:56 -0500
Subject: Re: Great Debate About Frequency Of ET Life -

>From: Ed Gehrman <egehrman.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 16:55:52 -0800
>Subject: Re: Great Debate About Frequency Of ET Life

>>Source: The Daily Galaxy - New York, New York, USA


>>February 13, 2007

>>Lonely Planets? A Great Debate About The Frequency Of
>>Extraterrestrial Life

>>NASA's Astrobiology Portal has published a series of six
>>Great Debates as prominent scientists sift through the
>>available evidence to reach what are sometimes directly
>>opposing conclusions. The first debate will explore the
>>factors required to make a planet habitable and the question
>>of whether complex life like that on Earth is common or rare
>>in our galaxy.


>>Great Debate Link:


>Dear List,

>This discussion is a must read for all who wish to know why
>establishment scientists can't possibly see how UFO could be
>from another star system.

>Thank you, Stuart!

Are you one of those guys Ed that could start a fight in an
empty room?

Your comment above is a little amibiguous but I presume you make
it to support your theory that "ET" in fact lives here on earth
with us and that by implication, these learned and erudite
scientists are agreeing with you.

In your dreams pal.

They can't even agree amongst themselves, let alone with you.

As Peter Ward says "In my view, life in the form of microbes or
their equivalents is very common in the universe, perhaps more
common than even Drake and Sagan envisioned."

This is a broadly held view and the real issue now is how far
away the nearest intelligent civilisation is. That it exists Ed
is a given. The old numbers game.

Which of course brings us back round to the argument about FTL

Which in itself is a futile and arrogant waste of time. Just
because we presume to know the extent of physics doen't mean
that we do indeed know the extent of physics, and others may
have taken it further. Why, they may even have learned how to
travel through worm holes.


Yep, just like those learned scientists.

Still leaves your POV intact though.


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com