UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Feb > Feb 22

Re: Anomalous Craft Near Twin Towers 9/11? -

From: Lan Fleming <lfleming6.nul>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:48:11 -0600
Fwd Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:10:44 -0500
Subject: Re: Anomalous Craft Near Twin Towers 9/11? -


>From: Nick Balaskas <Nikolaos.nul>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:47:13 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
>Subject: Re: Anomalous Craft Near Twin Towers 9/11?

<snip>

>The simple fact that this dark UFO is not seen to cross in front
>of the bright wall of the burning WTC tower as it streaked
>across the sky cannot justify Lan's conclusion that the UFO came
>from behind the tower. This is because there are also a few
>other places along the UFO's trajectory (this time through the
>sky) where it is also not seen!

That's simply not true. You apparently haven't looked at the
movie frame by frame. The object appears in 5 _consecutive_
frames, beginning at a point where it should have passed in
front of the white surface of the tower.

>An out-of-focus bird in flight would be such an object.

And why do you think that possibility hadn't occurred to me? Was
it a bird with an invisibility shield that happened to uncloak
by coincidence just as it passed the edge of the buliding?

If the object had appeared a bit higher in the frame, it might
have been a bird or something obscured by the dark background of
the black smoke, but it emerged at a point and traveled in a
direction such that it clearly should have crossed the white
face of the tower just below the black smoke.

Someone suggested it might be debris ejected from the tower by
the explosion. That might be a  possibility, though I'd be
surprised if debris from an explosion could reach supersonic
speeds.

>If Lan is correct and this dark UFO was further away than the
>WTC tower, it would also have to be much larger that the jet
>airliners that crashed into the two WTC towers.

No it wouldn't. The object is greatly elongated by motion blur
due to its high angular speed. Obviously, no details of the
object's shape can be seen to ever determine what it was. But
it's unlikely to be a bird or bug for the reasons I gave that I
think should be clear to anyone willing to examine the video
frame by frame.

>Did any sharp-eyed person notice a second UFO moving in a the
>same direction and parallel to the dark UFO in this video clip?
>This other UFO is bright and crosses in front of the WTC tower
>and a portion of the sky immediately beside the building! Is
>this other UFO just a video camera artifact or a real object?

Yes. It's _clearly_ debris ejected from the explosion in the
second tower. It shows up just as the fast-moving object
disappears. There's a  better view of it in the longer sequence
here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_TxzMUKwyc

>Better to re-examine and possibly reject this UFO now than to
>have us debate it again on the UFO UpDates List many decades
>later

Yes, but you haven't really examined it unless you look at it
frame by frame.




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com