From: Lan Fleming <lfleming6.nul> Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:48:11 -0600 Fwd Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 14:10:44 -0500 Subject: Re: Anomalous Craft Near Twin Towers 9/11? - >From: Nick Balaskas <Nikolaos.nul> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:47:13 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) >Subject: Re: Anomalous Craft Near Twin Towers 9/11? <snip> >The simple fact that this dark UFO is not seen to cross in front >of the bright wall of the burning WTC tower as it streaked >across the sky cannot justify Lan's conclusion that the UFO came >from behind the tower. This is because there are also a few >other places along the UFO's trajectory (this time through the >sky) where it is also not seen! That's simply not true. You apparently haven't looked at the movie frame by frame. The object appears in 5 _consecutive_ frames, beginning at a point where it should have passed in front of the white surface of the tower. >An out-of-focus bird in flight would be such an object. And why do you think that possibility hadn't occurred to me? Was it a bird with an invisibility shield that happened to uncloak by coincidence just as it passed the edge of the buliding? If the object had appeared a bit higher in the frame, it might have been a bird or something obscured by the dark background of the black smoke, but it emerged at a point and traveled in a direction such that it clearly should have crossed the white face of the tower just below the black smoke. Someone suggested it might be debris ejected from the tower by the explosion. That might be a possibility, though I'd be surprised if debris from an explosion could reach supersonic speeds. >If Lan is correct and this dark UFO was further away than the >WTC tower, it would also have to be much larger that the jet >airliners that crashed into the two WTC towers. No it wouldn't. The object is greatly elongated by motion blur due to its high angular speed. Obviously, no details of the object's shape can be seen to ever determine what it was. But it's unlikely to be a bird or bug for the reasons I gave that I think should be clear to anyone willing to examine the video frame by frame. >Did any sharp-eyed person notice a second UFO moving in a the >same direction and parallel to the dark UFO in this video clip? >This other UFO is bright and crosses in front of the WTC tower >and a portion of the sky immediately beside the building! Is >this other UFO just a video camera artifact or a real object? Yes. It's _clearly_ debris ejected from the explosion in the second tower. It shows up just as the fast-moving object disappears. There's a better view of it in the longer sequence here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_TxzMUKwyc >Better to re-examine and possibly reject this UFO now than to >have us debate it again on the UFO UpDates List many decades >later Yes, but you haven't really examined it unless you look at it frame by frame.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp