UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Feb > Feb 22

Re: Scientific Ufology: Roswell And Beyond -

From: Stanton Friedman <fsphys.nul>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:31:03 -0500 (EST)
Fwd Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:18:37 -0500
Subject: Re: Scientific Ufology: Roswell And Beyond -


>From: Chuck Zukowski <zukowski.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:30:50 -0700
>Subject: Re: Scientific Ufology: Roswell And Beyond

>From: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:52:12 -0500

>>Source: PaperBackSwap.Com - Clermont, Forida, USA

>>http://tinyurl.com/2t5ncy

>>Scientific Ufology: Roswell and Beyond - How Scientific
>> Methodology Can Prove The Reality Of UFOs

>>Author: Kevin D. Randle
>>ISBN-13: 9780380813834
>>ISBN-10: 0380813831
>>Publisher: HarperTorch
>>Publication Date: 2000-06-01
>>Pages: 256
>>Book Type: Mass Market Paperback
>>Book Description:

>>For the last fifty years, there has been a consistent attempt to
>>withhold solid information about alien visitation from the
>>general public.

>>Newly released letters reveal how time and again the U.S.
>>government and its military forces have lied about their
>>involvement in UFO research. Now, for the first time, noted
>>author Kevin D. Randle - one of the most respected names in UFO
>>research - examines the physical evidence of these visitors from
>>beyond our solar system.

<snip>

>This is nothing new, every piece of evidence and personal
>affidavits must be scientifically scrutinized. You may not have
>access to a polygraph or electron-microscope, but all evidence
>must be analyzed before published. Only a fool would look at a
>picture of a UFO and say, "Yep... that's a real one." And if
>they say that without investigation, then they're not authentic
>investigators. I call them arm-chair investigators, too lazy to
>do the ground work.

>I look at the scientific side of Roswell. The last 6 years it's
>been the archeology side. Gee, how many more testimonials do we
>need from Roswell? We have enough already. What we need is
>proof. I want a picture, debris, ah heck a piece of an alien
>body would do too! But any physical evidence one may get with
>the Roswell tag associated with it, better have a scientific
>explanation for associating it with a crash 60 years ago.
>Although, if I find an artifact under 6-10 centimetres of hard
>packed dirt in the middle of Lincoln County now... that's
>evidence.

Don't forget the book is almost 7 years old.

Stan Friedman



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com