From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 12:30:22 -0500 Fwd Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 08:22:37 -0500 Subject: Re: In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO? - >From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul> >To: ufoupdates.nul >Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:59:42 EST >Subject: Re: In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO? >>From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul> >>To: <ufoupdates.nul> >>Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 08:57:16 -0500 >>Subject: Re: In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO? >>>>http://tinyurl.com/yn8krl >>>>Published January 1, 2007 >>>>In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO? >>>>by >>>>Jon Hilkevitch >This is the first UFO story I've seen that made the covers of >the top news websites and is staying there. From Drudge Report >to CNN, this story is posted on the front page. Note however >that CNN's story is AP's blurb that is this: >http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/01/02/ufo.sighting.ap/index.html >That story is the sorry ass story that the Associated Press put >out and CNN has hit a new low by resourcing it. This story of a >few paragraphs ends with a quote from not any witnesses nor >officials in charge of investigating but from a union official >who makes with a wisecrack, >"At least one O'Hare controller, union official Craig Burzych, >was amused by it all. >"To fly 7 million light years to O'Hare and then have to turn >around and go home because your gate was occupied is simply >unacceptable," he said." >I ask you, wth does that have to do with the story? Why pursue >some wiseacre comment? Make a note of the news services that >are posting the wiseguy version of the story and those that are >posting the in depth version. It should tell you whom you >should trust for your news. >This incident took place on November 7, and it's taken almost >two months to come to the fore? Had it not been for good ol' >Jeff Rense and Peter Davenport it may have died on the vine. >I hope everyone on this List and then some pursues this story to >no end. >Don't let up for one minute. Note the news services that don't >do the service. >I who grew up in the news business has testified umpteen times >about the threats and bs the press engages in regarding UFO >stories. I've been at multiple witness events involving news >people and they still haven't seen the light of day. >I can't believe the official BS about weather phenomena and >ground lights. I have commented on this earlier ("my brain boils over" at such a ridiculous explanation). However, we have seen this situation over and over: nothing happens, and hothing happens and nothing happens (i.e., no UFO reports in th media) and then something blows the subject into public recognition and there is a flurry of press and then.... nothing happens and nothing happens and... etc. THe last "big one" was the JAL 1628 flight in Nov 1986 that resulted in an FAA investigation in early 1987 - see: http://brumac.8k.com and look for JAL1628). Forida's Channel 6 (channel6.com) has posted a survey which shows the public opinion of UFO sightings: Some United Airlines employees, some of them pilots, insist they saw a mysterious craft hovering low over Chicago's O'Hare Airport. The Federal Aviation Administration is chalking it up to weather conditions. What do you think? Choice Votes Percentage of 4477 Votes UFO 3720 83% Weather 757 17% I guess we know which way the UFO wind is blowing!
[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp