UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Jan > Jan 3

UFOs & Airliner Safety [was: In The sky! A bird? A

From: John Scheldroup <jschel.nul>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 13:39:40 -0600
Fwd Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:26:11 -0500
Subject: UFOs & Airliner Safety [was: In The sky! A bird? A

>From: Stanton Friedman <fsphys.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:19:43 -0400
>Subject: Re: In The sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO?

>>From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>>To: - UFO UpDates Subscribers - <UFO-UpDates.nul>
>>Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 9:59 AM
>>Subject: UFO UpDate: In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO?

>>Source: The Chicago Tribune - Illinois, USA


>>Published January 1, 2007

>>In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO?
>>Jon Hilkevitch

>>United Airlines denies its workers filed reports about


>>"There have been documented cases where safety appears to have
>>been implicated, and more and more we are coming to the point of
>>view that we are dealing with an intelligent phenomenon," said
>>Richard Haines, science director at the National Aviation
>>Reporting Center on Anomalous Phenomena, a private agency.

>>"We must be proactive before an aircraft goes down," said
>>Haines, a former chief of the Space Human Factors Office at
>>NASA's Ames Research Center.

>>Haines is investigating the O'Hare incident. He said he has
>>determined that no weather balloons were launched in the
>>vicinity of O'Hare on Nov. 7.


>I take it as a very good omen for the coming year when a major
>paper such as the Chicago Tribune quotes Dick Haines and files
>an FOIA request. Maybe somebody did read Herbert Strentz's PhD
>thesis about press coverage of UFOs. It was done at Medill
>School of Journalism at Northwestern University just outside
>Chicago and had some strong words for the inadequacy of press
>coverage of the subject.

Hello Stan,

Excuse me if this comes off as poor man's paragraph style
because I'll skip a few lines and go straight to a matter of
fact without anything greater then speculation and short sighted
guess work on top of this, I will venture to guess that what you
yourself might be thinking about sort of correlates with my own
speculation like the meeting of minds, this in regards to the
event at O'Hare.

Lets jump right in using your example that you provided in an
earlier post a short while ago using your theory that there
could be an aircraft carrier parked somewhere in the solar
system with these smaller modules dispatched while piggy backing
back and forth like spring boarding off the larger system.

The theory goes like smaller modules are sent out to Earth for
the occasional reconisiance of sightings spots on Earth, and
these we will call the carrier jets, for some reason that we
quickly correlate these events at O'Hare to this 6-24 ft carrier
jet that hovers over O'Hare we could say it is possible that a
larger system is in fact parked elsewhere hidden from human
eyes, far side of the moon, the planet Mars, asteroid, or
elsewhere... but whatelse goes on with this piggy back theory.

Question: Is there a need to survey O'Hare airport when if many
modules in the past have already surveyed this location many
times before, once, twice, that matter how many times before?.

No I'm not referring to a future landing spot for theory larger
systems which smaller modules piggy back with, so we come to
this and I know you probably don't like questions phrased in
some looping logicians way but as this will show it opens up
cause for some suspicion that comes to mind:

What is on the alien mind if were to guess suspiciously about
their motives to possible intention for surveying in broad
daylight that which has been mapped many times before ?


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com