UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Jan > Jan 3

Re: The '06 O'Hare UFO - Kaeser

From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 17:54:46 -0500
Fwd Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:18:34 -0500
Subject: Re: The '06 O'Hare UFO - Kaeser


>From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:59:42 EST
>Subject: Re: In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO?

>>From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 08:57:16 -0500
>>Subject: Re: In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO?

>>>From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 17:03:16 EST
>>>Subject: Re: In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO?

>>>>Source: The Chicago Tribune - Illinois, USA

>>>>http://tinyurl.com/yn8krl

>>>>Published January 1, 2007

<snip>

>Hi Steve,

>This is the first UFO story I've seen that made the covers of
>the top news websites and is staying there. From Drudge Report
>to CNN, this story is posted on the front page. Note however
>that CNN's story is AP's blurb that is this:

>http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/01/02/ufo.sighting.ap/index.html

>That story is the sorry ass story that the Associated Press put
>out and CNN has hit a new low by resourcing it. This story of a
>few paragraphs ends with a quote from not any witnesses nor
>officials in charge of investigating but from a union official
>who makes with a wisecrack,

>"At least one O'Hare controller, union official Craig Burzych,
>was amused by it all.

>"To fly 7 million light years to O'Hare and then have to turn
>around and go home because your gate was occupied is simply
>unacceptable," he said."

>I ask you, wth does that have to do with the story? Why pursue
>some wiseacre comment? Make a note of the news services that
>are posting the wiseguy version of the story and those that are
>posting the in depth version. It should tell you whom you
>should trust for your news.

>This incident took place on November 7, and it's taken almost
>two months to come to the fore? Had it not been for good ol'
>Jeff Rense and Peter Davenport it may have died on the vine.

>I hope everyone on this List and then some pursues this story to
>no end.

>Don't let up for one minute. Note the news services that don't
>do the service.

>I who grew up in the news business has testified umpteen times
>about the threats and bs the press engages in regarding UFO
>stories. I've been at multiple witness events involving news
>people and they still haven't seen the light of day.

>I can't believe the official BS about weather phenomena and
>ground lights.

>I'm quite sure someone had a cell phone camera trained on this
>thing.

>Matter of fact, I'm hearing a whole lot of people did. Let's see
>what shakes from that tree.


Hi Greg,

Let me begin by saying that my earlier message was in error, and
the investigation into this sighting is being coordinated by
Richard Haines of NARCAP. CUFOS and the Fund have offered to
help in interviewing witnesses, but they have not been directly
involved.

That being said, let's remember that this is an eight-week-old
event and the newspaper is pretty far behind the eight ball in
reporting an unknown object flying over the City. This, for most
news agencies, would be a soft news story and handled more as
filler than news. I missed the CNN piece, but a friend at work
saw it and asked what I knew (which is primarily what I've read
here). I would also like to see any cell phone images or video,
but it's been eight weeks and I haven't heard of anything
surfacing.

FYI, I also spent about eight years in the press and have been
hoping for better treatment of the subject, but it will take
more timely coverage than this.


Steve




[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com