UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Jan > Jan 5

Re: Holes In The Cloud Deck - Scheldroup

From: John Scheldroup <jschel.nul>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:13:18 -0600
Fwd Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 07:42:27 -0500
Subject: Re: Holes In The Cloud Deck - Scheldroup

>From: Jim Deardorff <deardorj.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul,
>Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 09:44:16 -0800
>Subject: Holes In The Cloud Deck [was: In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO?]

>>From: Michael Tarbell <mtarbell.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:39:55 -0700
>>Subject: Re: In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO?

>>>From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul>
>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 15:35:15 -0000
>>>Subject: Re: In the sky! A bird? A plane? A... UFO?


>>>>A flying saucerlike object hovered low over O'Hare International
>>>>Airport for several minutes before bolting through thick clouds
>>>>with such intense energy that it left an eerie hole in overcast
>>>>skies, said some United Airlines employees who observed the

>>>Well, a number of ground staff and pilots as witnesses to a low-
>>>altitude daylight object over a major airport has to add up to
>>>one of the most intriguing cases I've heard for a while. I hope
>>>references to any follow-up investigations get posted here.

>>This is intriguing indeed. The observation that the passage of
>>the object created a "hole" in the overcast is particularly
>>interesting. There would seem to only be two ways for this to
>>happen (but perhaps an atmospheric scientist will chime in):

>>(1) the water droplets in the cloud were heated to the vapor
>>state; or,

>>(2) the size distribution of the droplets was modified such that
>>they no longer were effective scatterers at visible wavelengths.


>If this occurred while the total cloud-water content remained
>about the same, it would require a sudden coagulation of all
>droplets into a few giant drops. The mechanism of doing this,
>over a particular circular area and no further, would belong in
>the UFO-high-tech super-science category, i.e., paranormal, or
>beyond present understanding. I favor the latter category as
>holding the explanation - some effect we don't yet begin to
>understand any more than how a UFO can hover silently, make
>itself invisible, overcome inertia, accelerate away extremely
>fast, send down a beam of solid-like light, etc.

Hi Jim,

As the object came to rest then hover beneath the clouds only to
vanish a short time later from our air space, or were it said
that inertial space frames that coming upon rest later were
cause for a transfer of space to the object as the space frames
moved to a forward position.

Did the physical properties of the object cause the hole in the
clouds or did the space frames accelerate faster only giving the
appearance of a hole in the clouds.

The inherit energy content of the UFO do cancel out their
quantity that become momentum or is it their zero momentum for
transfer becoming zero distance, velocity and time.

"Normal science can be determined in part by the direct
inspection of paradigms, a process that is often aided by but
does not depend upon formulation of rules and assumptions.
Indeed, the existence of a paradigm need not even imply that any
full set of rules exist."

       --Thomas S Kuhn, The Structure Of Scientific Revolutions


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com