UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Jan > Jan 11

Re: The Press UFOs & Who Stands To Gain? - Maccabee

From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:15:00 -0500
Fwd Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 08:07:46 -0500
Subject: Re: The Press UFOs & Who Stands To Gain? - Maccabee

>From: Josh Goldstein <lovolution.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 09:46:55 -0800
>Subject: Re: The Press UFOs & Who Stands To Gain?

>>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 11:21:20 -0500
>>Subject: Re: The Press UFOs & Who Stands To Gain?


>>Last night (Sunday) I saw on CNN Headline News (I think it was)
>>an interview with Hilkevitch during which he made the comment
>>that the objects characteristics and shape seemed to indicate it
>>wasn't made by man or on earth or something like that. I forget
>>the exact wording.

>>My immediate response is "there's a guy hanging his neck out"
>>(to be chopped off). I presume someone will post a transcript of
>>that interview.

>Aloha Bruce and all other Listerions,

>It still galls me that the FAA thinks it can get away with
>proclaiming the sighting a weather event without any
>investigation. Back in the day when I was an active pilot I
>relied on the FAA extensively. They always were cooperative and
>correct. This proclamation of a weather event is amateurish and
>smacks of a coverup. How many FAA employees looked at the
>reported object when it was visible. Most likely none actually
>looked at it or the hole in the cloud cover.


>In addition, flight manifests can be obtained to show who
>arrived or departed in the general time area. Those people
>could be questioned to find out if they were witnesses to the
>sighting. All airport personnel plus cab or bus drivers could
>be questioned. They can also be asked about military or other
>government agents who may have been present following the
>sighting. All the witnesses could document their sightings in
>signed affidavits.

>The above are just a few ideas of ways the sighting could be

I suspect that someone or some organization knows who all the
witnesses are, at least those who have talked to someone/anyone
about what they saw. I suspect that someone knows whether or not
photos were taken and by whom. I suspect that the investigation
is ongoing "sub rosa". Recall the testimony of John Callahan who
was responsible for investigating the Japan Airlines case 20
years ago. Twenty years ago at this very time ("as we speak"..
but 20 years ago). According to Callahan the White House was
interested and other "spooky" organizations including the CIA.
Whether or not non-FAA investigations are occurring is a matter
for speculation.

But one this is certain: the reporter (Hilkevitch) and the
newspaper were suprised that this story has "legs." Hilkevitch
wrote a third story about it two days ago. For any non-
continuing or "single event" story to last a week is surprising,
and this applies doubly to UFO stories. In the Japan Airlines
case the story lasted for several months, but only because the
FAA investigation kept the news interest.

[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com