UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Jan > Jan 21

Re: FM Radio Gives Away Aliens? - Golubik

From: Viktor Golubik <Diverge247.nul>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 18:35:37 EST
Fwd Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:28:36 -0500
Subject: Re: FM Radio Gives Away Aliens? - Golubik

>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 21:54:33 -0000
>Subject: Re: FM Radio Gives Away Aliens?

>>From: Viktor Golubik <Diverge247.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 15:40:33 EST
>>Subject: Re: FM Radio Gives Away Aliens?

>>>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 12:48:30 -0000
>>>Subject: FM Radio Gives Away Aliens?

>>>FM Radio Gives Away Aliens?



>>>For instance, and from our own experience, a species is likely
>>>to invent radio communication and use it, but only, so far as
>>>know, for a couple of hundred years.



>>If alien spacecraft are maneuvering within our telemetry systems
>>here on Earth, then it may be the unintended (default) radio
>>wave transmissions we should be after... perhaps just one
>>telltale signature of their interaction with our atmosphere and
>>their propulsive systems. Hopefully, this may be outside their
>>absolute control for "Any" specified period of time, not just
>>limited to 100 years.

>Good point Viktor,

>There's already indications that some craft give off gamma rays
>- either intentionally or as side-effect of propulsion or other
>`engines', so it's quite likely they're emitting somewhat in
>radio frequencies. Although that's a pretty wide area to search
>or monitor. And of course we have the problem, familiar from
>many reports, of `slowed electrons' in the vicinity of UFOs;
>like dead ignitions and radios, stopped clocks etc.

Hi Ray,

As long as the EM signal is strong enough in amplitude to induce
a local current in the wires which interferes/spikes the
natural/internal current flow, much can happen with both digital
an analog electronic systems. The lower the current flow
required for a device to opperate, the more vulnerable the
system. (We can talk about shielded systems too)

In the event of car engine shutdown and if exact distance to the
interfering object is know, the intensity of such a burst may be
more desirable to calculate, either as a direct (intended) pulse
or an (incidental) global 3D emission pattern - The energy
requirements to produce just incidental radiation could be great
at the source given the natural inverse square drop-off profile.
And, that may merely be a sub-EM component of the total energy
output, in which case, the real source output could be
orders/significantly higher. I'm sure such calculations have
already been attempted, but I'm not certain?

>However, it might be that some records of `radio signatures', in
>communication frequency bands, are already in the files, from
>airfield control tower logs and aircraft crew reports,
>especially those of fighters sent up on intercept attempts.


Can't disagree...

What's nice about off-the-shelf $100,000 spectrum analyzers is
their ability to look at the frequency domain and program their
search, zoom, and lock modes. Coleectivel they can cover a 100
Giga hertz range at any given moment... that's from 30 to 100
billion cycles per second in every sweep... so evan very low
frequencies can contribute to your understanding of the pattern.
In which case, it would be interesting to see if any harmonic
modes exist.

Very curious if any reports in the O'Hare incident made comments
about radio interference patterns. Is it true that some say the
incident lasted for upwards of 20 minutes? If so, that's plenty
of time to have collected some unexpected sources of data and



[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com