UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Jan > Jan 27

Re: LMH Site On O'Hare UFO - Davenport

From: Peter B. Davenport <director.nul>
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:19:17 -0800
Fwd Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:27:31 -0500
Subject: Re: LMH Site On O'Hare UFO - Davenport

>From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:34:09 -0000
>Subject: Re: LMH Site On O'Hare UFO

>>Two Cell Phone Images of Disc Over Chicago O'Hare Airport

>>Copyright 2007 by Linda Moulton Howe

>>"Both digital experts (David Biedny and Jeff Ritzmann) agree that the
>>second image, very much like the first image, virtually has no signs of
>>being edited."

>>     -- Mark Allin, Co-Owner, AboveTopSecret.com

>Virtually? Hmmm. This piece states that neither image shows any
>sign at all of any artefact or inconsistency when closely
>examined by experts. Various digital wizards are quoted saying
>there is no sign of anything odd in either photo, that both seem
>to show the same object taken from different sides of the
>airfield that afternoon. Then we're treated to the speculation
>that miles-wide holes in cloud occurring from time to time all
>over the world (meteorologically interesting to be sure) are
>caused by rocketing UFOs.

>This is just depressing and unhelpful to the real investigation
>going on into events at O'Hare.

>If you play with the gamma of the first image you find that an
>unnatural looking wedge of grey tone emerges bottom left of the
>"UFO". I don't insist that this is suspicious, but it is
>obvious, and does at least need noticing in any analysis.

>But at least the conditions in the first photo bear some
>resemblance to the weather conditions at the time (solid
>overcast at 1900 ft, fading daylight, visibility 4 miles with
>haze). The second photo very obviously shows bright sky
>conditions and shadows from a sun near the zenith.

The photos that have come forward almost certainly have nothing
to do with the original sighting over O'Hare. One of the
witnesses has looked at them, and declared that neither looks
anything like the object he witnessed on November 07. I allow
for the possibility that they may be part of a disinformation

I recommend that, in order to save precious time, we drop
further discussion of these hoaxed photos. Just by continuing
the discussion about them, we may be playing into the hands of
folks who don't want the American People to know the truth about
that incident.



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com