From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul> Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:17:44 -0000 Fwd Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:09:33 -0500 Subject: Re: LMH Site On O'Hare UFO - Shough >From: Michael Stimson <Michael001.nul> >To: <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 20:13:48 -0000 >Subject: Re: LMH Site On O'Hare UFO >>From: Peter B. Davenport <director.nul> >>To: <ufoupdates.nul> >>Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:19:17 -0800 >>Subject: Re: LMH Site On O'Hare UFO >>>From: Martin Shough <parcellular.nul> >>>To: <ufoupdates.nul> >>>Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 18:34:09 -0000 >>>Subject: Re: LMH Site On O'Hare UFO <snip> >This current O'Hare case, it's going to be talked about and this >will get bandied about and that will get bandied about, names >will be dropped and so on. >I give it two weeks at most until people go back to the comfort >of discussing cases which allegedly occurred at least 40 years >ago. >The technology is here to get evidence right now, but UFOs are >assumed to be an American phenomenon as quoted above. >There is no focus, or determination on the part of most people >to do anything. People like talking, but taking action is a >different matter. It's easier to pass opinions on Roswell than >it is to say 'Right. We have O'Hare and we have photos. What's >the story?' I think you'll find that investigation is indeed going on, as you speak, Michael. I know this because I've been involved in a very peripheral way with the NARCAP investigation, as have others on this list, and Peter Davenport has been on the case since almost day one. Perhaps you can tell us what "action" you have been taking since November 2006?
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp