|
From: Terry Groff <terrygroff.nul> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:25:46 -0500 Fwd Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:10:40 -0400 Subject: Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts' - >From: Paul Scott Anderson <paulscottanderson.nul> >To: ufoupdates.nul >Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:47:01 -0700 >Subject: Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts' >>From: Sergey Shpakovsky <sergejsh.nul> >>To: ufoupdates.nul >>Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:52:49 -0400 (EDT) >>Subject: Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts' >>I can't say about laboratory documents, but these "drone parts" >>can be perfectly created using some CGI programs. >Perhaps, and any of the images probably could be as well. But >has _anyone_ on this list read/listened to the taped witness >interviews (with names and backgrounds) that I linked to before? >These are the ones that have become available _since_ the >initial "Chad" report which some people assumed must be a hoax. >I would just like to see someone approach this objectively, >taking into account all of the reported sightings so far >(purportedly going back at least to the 80s in various states). >Could it all be a hoax? Yes. But some ufologists stated that >there were no eyewitnesses on record with known names and >backgrounds, and now we have that. I'm talking about other >eyewitness accounts primarily, not the "Isaac" story so much >which I'm still more uncertain of at this point. >Paul What I would really like to see is some good, non-digital film. I distrust digital images more and more each day. Terry Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast See: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp