From: Terry Groff <terrygroff.nul>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:25:46 -0500
Fwd Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 09:10:40 -0400
Subject: Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts' -


>From: Paul Scott Anderson <paulscottanderson.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 09:47:01 -0700
>Subject: Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts'

>>From: Sergey Shpakovsky <sergejsh.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:52:49 -0400 (EDT)
>>Subject: Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts'

>>I can't say about laboratory documents, but these "drone parts"
>>can be perfectly created using some CGI programs.

>Perhaps, and any of the images probably could be as well. But
>has _anyone_ on this list read/listened to the taped witness
>interviews (with names and backgrounds) that I linked to before?
>These are the ones that have become available _since_ the
>initial "Chad" report which some people assumed must be a hoax.
>I would just like to see someone approach this objectively,
>taking into account all of the reported sightings so far
>(purportedly going back at least to the 80s in various states).

>Could it all be a hoax? Yes. But some ufologists stated that
>there were no eyewitnesses on record with known names and
>backgrounds, and now we have that. I'm talking about other
>eyewitness accounts primarily, not the "Isaac" story so much
>which I'm still more uncertain of at this point.

>Paul

What I would really like to see is some good, non-digital film.
I distrust digital images more and more each day.


Terry



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/