UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Jul > Jul 2

Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts' -

From: Greg Boone <Evolbaby.nul>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 17:36:13 EDT
Archived: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:00:51 -0400
Subject: Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts' -

>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 12:36:27 -0400
>Subject: Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts'

>>From: Robert Gates <RGates8254.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 02:07:35 EDT
>>Subject: Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts'

>>>From: Bob Shell <bob.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 09:20:04 -0400
>>>Subject: Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts'

>>>>From: Terry Groff <terrygroff.nul>
>>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>>Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:25:46 -0500
>>>>Subject: Re: To Linda Howe On 'Issac' & CARET 'Parts'

>>>>What I would really like to see is some good, non-digital film.
>>>>I distrust digital images more and more each day.

>>>As well you should. Every aspect of a digital image can be
>>>easily manipulated with cheap (or free) software today. Images
>>>can be completely created.

>>>Unlike film, there is no negative to serve as a record of the
>>>original form of the image.

>>>We must realize that digital images have very little evidentiary


>>The bottom line to images, whether digital, film, video or
>>movies is that it should be throughly investigated, examined, as
>>well as the witness story and any confirming witnesses. The key
>>word is investigate. Unlike some researchers who hear a story,
>>or receive a package and promptly regurgitate it all over the
>>internet and talk radio without a careful investigation.

>This is merely re-stating what I learned over 20 years ago from
>intensive investigation of the McMinnville photo case: A photo a
>UFO does not make.

>And this applies to film and video, but film and video at least
>raise the bar for hoaxing - makes it more difficult. However,
>with 'this digital stuff we can have George Bush and Hillary
>standing on the same stage with victory sign indicating that
>George is VP under Hillary as President. Sounds like something
>we might see in the Weekly World News.

>Investigation is paramount!

>And the better you learn that the sooner off you'll be!!



This scenario with these drones is driving me crazy.

We've gone from a few photos to somehow, someway meandering to
some alien disclosure and we haven't finished part one of the
investigation of whether there is a real object or two. We've
jumped the shark, the dolphin, the giant squid and already tied
it in with the illuminati and the year 2012 AD.

I wasn't buying this story no matter how many toy surprises were
inside. I sent the pics to an expert in top secret devices and
all he said, which I've posted on the list, is that he had
indeed seen technology like this and pointed me to a famous
engineer in aviation. That's it. No stories about ETs.

We need to go back to the beginning of these drone stories and
do our due diligence. Prove first that there are such devices.
After that then we can move on to the source of these devices.
That'll take you to the who.



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com