UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Jul > Jul 22

Re: Why The Cover-Up?

From: Alfred Lehmberg <alienview.nul>
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 08:57:26 -0500
Archived: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 12:32:40 -0400
Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up? 


>From: Ed Gehrman <egehrman.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 11:32:41 -0700
>Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up?

>>From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 09:00:46 -0500
>>Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up?

>>>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:06:09 +0100
>>>Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up?

>>>>From: Jerome Clark <jkclark.nul>
>>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>>Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 08:51:28 -0500
>>>>Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up?

>><snip>

>>>Here's the fatal weakness of your 'argument': who defines what
>>>is 'scientific' or 'pseudo-science'?

>>>If you say 'authority' or 'established science' then we should
>>>still be believing in a geo-centric universe and obeying the
>>>mind-control rules of the Inquisition - and Galileo would've
>>>been forever silenced.

>>Ray,

>>One hesitates to comment, for fear of making it sound as if it
>>merited more than a horse laugh. I guess, though, that in the
>>wacky world of ufology 2007, Ed Gehrman is Galileo.

>Jerry,

>I don't think Ray is saying that I'm Galileo, but that your
>attitude of condemnation toward my research is similar to the
>mind control found during the inquisition.

>You have yet to present a single ounce of evidence that my ideas
>are horse-laughable. I don't think you can. You have an eerie
>faith that I'm wrong, so no proof is necessary. I hope he list
>can see through this mindless fog of ridicule.

>>One is reminded of Orwell's famous crack about vacuous arguments
>>that seek to give an "appearance of solidity to pure wind." On
>>the other hand, unlike the creations of clueless ufologists'
>>fanciful imaginations, pure wind actually _exists_.

>>But if you want to believe Ed Gehrman is the Galileo of our
>>time, be my guest. And never you mind all those laughing
>>horses.

>I consider this a pretty stupid statement, really not funny at
>all. I'd love to discuss my reasoning, so why the attitude?

Just a feeling, a thought had after too big a breakfast, but I
get the distinct impression that 'Dick & Jerry', are evolving
into the 'Penn & Teller' of UFO UpDates. I suspect it's not
entirely inappropriate given that something similar has recently
been prophesied by Stuart Miller... SDI #442, I believe... Maybe
#443.

Consequently, it might also be appropriate to remind everybody
that both gentlemen are entirely convinced regarding the
'actuality' of UFOs and that thought regarding the presumed
'occupants' of same, is justified.

Not so Penn and Teller after all...
alienview.nul
www.AlienView.net
AVG Blog -- http://alienviewgroup.blogspot.com/
U F O M a g a z i n e -- www.ufomag.com


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com