UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Jul > Jul 25

Re: Why The Cover-Up?

From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:47:13 -0300
Archived: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:08:36 -0400
Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up?

>From: Ed Gehrman <egehrman.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 11:00:12 -0700
>Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up?

>>From: Richard Hall <hallrichard99.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:36:02 +0000
>>Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up?

>>>From: Ed Gehrman <egehrman.nul>
>>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 11:06:05 -0700
>>>Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up?

>>>Thanks, Steve. I don't believe that I support the notion that
>>>all theories are of equal value. I don't remember saying that

>>I didn't say you did, Ed. It's your defenders who act that way.


>I don't have any defenders. I can't think of a single person who
>buys into my theory 100%. What Steve and Ray and Bob
>were defending was my right to an informed opinion. They felt
>I should be able present it to the List without being attacked
>or made to look ridiculous.

>>>>The utter necessity of peer review aside, hpothesis or theory
>>>>construction requiires building a logically coherent and
>>>>empirically grounded explanation for a body of data. not simply
>>>>pulling some wild-ass notion out of the sky.

>>>My theory is supported by science theory (convergent evolution)
>>>and is logically coherent and very simple to understand:
>>>Sometime during the last two-hundred million years another
>>>species of tool makers evolved and populated the earth in enough
>>>numbers to create the technology that is responsible to the UFO
>>>seen daily across our planet. We live parallel existences and
>>>are at the point of possible convergence. All the above is
>>>possible, scientifically, and historically. It is not some
>>>"wild-ass notion". It is by far the simplest explanation, and
>>>makes sense of all the information that ufology has collected
>>>over the years. All one needs to do is substitute ancient
>>>monotreme civilization (AMC) for ETH.

>>And where do we go to see these people, Ed?

>I know you and I agree on one important fact. Humans world- wide
>are being visited, on a daily basis, by UFO and their occupants.
>These visitations can only be the result of a very short list of
>causes: our own military, folks from other star systems (ETH),
>or folks from our own solar system. (I'm ruling out other causes
>such as angels, daemons, time travelers, interdimentional
>entities, etc, because I assume you agree with me that these are
>not serious possibilities) I have ruled out ETH because science
>says FTL travel is not possible.

What has the speed of light got to do with the ETH? That's like
saying that the theory that the west was populated with settlers
couldn't happen because wagon trains were too slow. Speed has
nothing to do with it. Time is the significant factor here and
there are billions of years of time.

Your whole argument falls apart over this one point.

Why after co-existing with us for millions of years are these
"critters" so interested in our bowels and sexual reproductive
systems? Where is their whole [social, maunufacturing, housing,
economic based] infrastructure.

There is no such thing as a TR-3b.

Don Ledger

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com