UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Jul > Jul 29

Re: Why The Cover-Up?

From: Paul Scott Anderson <paulscottanderson.nul>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 17:42:49 -0700
Archived: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 11:06:02 -0400
Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up?

>From: Don Ledger <dledger.nul>
>To:  ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:05:35 -0300
>Subject: Re: Why The Cover-Up?

>I reject any earth-built theory re. the 'drones' because they
>have no visible means of support or propulsion. That left some
>other- worldly construction whose builders had a propensity for
>advertizing on the craft's structure. Why? These aren't
>airliners after all.

>It seems that there are those out there who get a thrill out of
>perpetuating hoaxes and photoshopping one up like the 'drones'
>is much easier to do then stomping around a field with a board a
>rope and a 100 foot tape measure.

My point (again) was that some on the List seemed to reject the
'drone' reports because they seemed too 'weird' and because the
photos were assumed to all be hoaxes, the several other
eyewitness accounts were ignored.

Something as unconventional as the 'drones' should be treated
with cautious skepticism of course, but when you have possible
additional eywitness accounts going back at least to the 80s,
they _must_ be taken into account as well.

So far, the only researcher who has tried to do that is Linda
Howe, as far as I can tell.

Have any other ufologists bothered to do this and actually talk
to any of these people, before making hasty conclusions?

Paul Scott Anderson

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com