UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Jun > Jun 16

Re: U.S. Spies On Ufologists - Sparks

From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 02:04:26 EDT
Fwd Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 08:22:20 -0400
Subject: Re: U.S. Spies On Ufologists - Sparks

>From: Nicholas Redfern <nick_redfern.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
>Subject: Re: U.S. Spies On Ufologists

>>From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 07:15:38 EDT
>>Subject: Re: U.S. Spies On Ufologists

>>>From: Nicholas Redfern <nick_redfern.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 06:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
>>>Subject: Re: U.S. Spies On Ufologists


>>>However, time and again, I found a couple of central themes to
>>>the surveillance: namely that it was undertaken because (a)
>>>intelligence agencies suspected that certain ufologists were
>>>being duped and hired by overseas intelligence agencies into
>>>gathering for them classified defense information of a
>>>specifically non-UFO nature (but while using their UFO research
>>>as a cover); and (b) because it was suspected that some
>>>ufologists were using the UFO subject as a way of subtly
>>>spreading political data of a type that the Intel world had
>>>concerns about.

>>>I found _no_ instance where any ufologist was being watched
>>>because they were getting 'too close to the truth' about literal
>>>ET-driven UFOs

>>Hmm, there is another explanation, the _real_ explanation I
>>believe, which you do not consider or mention. Pity to miss out.
>>I have posted on it many times and will not belabor the matter
>>yet again, it just goes nowhere. This is just an FYI that I
>>think you are way off base.

>>Good luck.


>No, I'm not off-base. I'm right on it.

You are completely off base. You give explanations A, B and
the rejected C (Ufologists who get "too close to the truth"). Then
I remind you there is a specific real and principal explanation D
that I have previously posted about, and you beat the dead
horse again on A and B, instead of researching D.

Are you going to continue to beat the dead horse on A and B?

By the way, are you still in contact with your disinformation
psychological warfare experts from your BS in the Desert book?
What do they say about your latest venture? Did they provide any
of the information for it?

Also, just for the record I found some evidence that in the very
earliest days there was some Official Harassment of type C
(UFOlogists getting "too close to the truth") but it merged with
type B (Ufologists treated as subversives) and transformed into
type D.

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com