From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul> Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 22:17:51 -0500 Fwd Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 13:00:31 -0500 Subject: Re: The Phoenix Lights 10th Anniversary - Maccabee >From: Jeff Olson <jlolson.nul> >To: <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:23:39 -0600 >Subject: Re: The Phoenix Lights 10th Anniversary >>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul> >>To: <ufoupdates.nul> >>Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:05:56 -0500 >>Subject: Re: The Phoenix Lights 10th Anniversary <snip> >>I triangulated the 1998 lights first because in those sightings >>it was clear that several videographers with a wide separation >>had videotaped the same lights. I used this triangulation to >>confirm the validity of the technique for determining the >>distances of these lights. <snip> >Perhaps I'm being dense, but what exactly are the implications >of your triangulated distances, Bruce? Does this have a bearing >on whether the lights are flares or true unidentified flying >objects? Certainly does have bearing on whether UFO or misidentification. See: http://brumac.8k.com/phoenixlights1.html Also see the supplementary information added several years after the initial paper was posted on my web site: http://brumac.8k.com/phoenixsupplement/ Download "supplementary discussion.doc" this is a Word document.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp