UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Mar > Mar 10

Re: Smolin On Physics - Dickenson

From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 14:58:06 -0000
Fwd Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 12:42:19 -0500
Subject: Re: Smolin On Physics - Dickenson


>From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 01:33:29 -0000
>Subject: Smolin On Physics

<snip>

>a - Physics is still in a Newtonian mind-set. E.g 'atoms of any
>given element are identical and self-defined' - that's a
>Newtonian concept still held by most physicists today;

>b - He then said "We know no more than we did in 1975 - and
>that's not good" - implying physics is stuck in a dead-end.

>Or maybe that real physics is now secret?

Hi,

Off-Llist chat says maybe some of the dots need joining up.

If we're expected to accept 'scientific' statements that certain
things are impossible, then it seems advisable to be sure of the
'science'.

Smolin is doing some thinking and Halton Arp is doing some
finding - like why are some redshifts partly quantumized?
Present science has no explanation. Present science daren't even
consider that fact because it shakes the 'standard model' of the
Universe. So it's suppressed. And Alain Aspect got some
dangerous experimental results - which are even now being
ignored by scared mainstreamers.

Here's a double quote which seems undeniable - "Entanglement -
 demands a field or force acting instantaneously over arbitrary
distance, perhaps universe-wide;

Half-life - demands that each particle in the universe be
informed of the existence and action of each other particle in
the universe, most probably by way of that instantaneous force
or field." End of double quote

[Maybe try Wiki for Quantum_entanglement and also for
Radioactive_decay#Radioactive_decay_rates, there's some good
stuff there]

I'm sure Listers can see that many Ufology arguments of the past
need to be re-visited in the light of those two conclusions
alone. How many more 'dangerous' conclusions have been hidden in
dusty files by mainstream science?


Cheers

Ray D



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com