UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Mar > Mar 16

Kal K. Korff Strikes Again

From: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:36:35 -0400
Fwd Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 07:36:35 -0400
Subject: Kal K. Korff Strikes Again




Source: Kevin Randle's Blog

http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2007/03/kal-k-korff-strikes-again.html

Thursday, March 15, 2007


Kal K. Korff Strikes Again

Well, I had hoped to have nothing more to say about Kal Korff
but I have been swamped with emails from him over the last
several days. I hadn't thought I had said anything too
controversial, just commenting on his commission in an
organization that no one had heard of and a suggestion that his
claim of a truly astonishingly high IQ might be more hyperbole
than established fact. I'm not sure about the validity of a self
administered IQ test... nor am I certain of the validity of any
IQ test, but that's something else.

In my original post, which contrary to what Korff claims, is not
on Paul Kimball's blog, I didn't mention the self-evident
contradiction in Korff's claims. He said he was a member of this
supersecret anti-terrorist organization called Special Secret
Services S3 (as proof of his claims, Korff at left in uniform).
If it is so secret, why is Korff promoting it on radio,
television and the Internet. Wouldn't you think that a secret
organization would want to remain secret? Wouldn't my suggestion
that nobody every heard of them make them happy?

But, according to Korff, they were annoyed at me. I would have
thought they would want to thank me for helping them to hide.
Now, rather than a passing mention in my notes on Korff, I
actually identify the organization which has made Korff a
captain (and why only a captain? Why not a major or colonel or
general?).

But here is another point. Korff has let me know that he, and
his buddies in the media, and possibly an attorney or two, are
going to subject me to a forensic audit of my work in the UFO
field and then publish the results. I wonder why everything is
now forensic... forensic psychology, forensic artists, forensic
bath mat creators, but that is a question for another time.

Korff, and his alleged pals, are annoyed that I haven't
apologized for Frank Kaufmann. Hey, I thought exposing the guy
was enough. I mean, sure, I thought he was telling me the truth,
he gave me documents to prove he was who he said he was, showed
me pictures, and promised to prove the truth when the time came.
So, yes, I thought he was credible. When I asked Walter Haut
about Kaufmann, Walter told that anything Kaufmann said was
golden. Hell, it was Walter Haut who told me about him.

So, the moment I learned the truth, that Kaufmann had created
documents, that we had copies of both the originals and the
fakes, I told Mark Rodeghier of the J. Allen Hynek Center for
UFO Studies that we needed to publish the results. No waiting
around for an opportune moment. No dancing around the question,
but to publish the results as fast as possible, even if they
shed a bad light on me.

What that means is that I helped expose the witness that I once
believed. What is the problem there? I corrected the
inaccuracies just as soon as I learned the truth. Is there
anyone in the UFO community who hasn't believed a witness who
later turned out to be lying to them?

Have I made other mistakes? Sure. I believed Don Schmitt was my
friend and a credible investigator. I didn't know he was telling
people that I had been planted on him and that he suspected me
of being a government agent. When some of his lies began to
crash down, I defended him. The last straw for me was to learn
that he had been telling people not to talk to me. That from my
partner in investigation and this doesn't even begin to cover
the damage he has done to the Roswell case and UFO
investigation.

Stan Friedman will tell you that I'm wrong about MJ-12, though I
don't think so. He'll tell you that I'm wrong about Gerald
Anderson, though it's clear that Anderson was making it up as he
went along otherwise there would be no understanding of his
contradictory statements. He'll tell you there was a crash on
the Plains of San Agustin but won't tell you that the diary kept
by Barney Barnett's wife contradicts this and Anderson.

But I have drifted away here. Kal Korff seems to believe that I
have maligned him. He thinks that I should now be investigated.
Hell, I've been waiting for someone to do just that. I heard
Stan Friedman once ask friends if I have ever served on active
duty as an intelligence officer. I told them it was the wrong
question. What Stan wanted to know was if I had ever served on
extended active duty as an intelligence officer. The answer is
yes.

If we wanted to look at just one aspect of Kal Korff's genius,
all we have to do is look at his claim to have a 500 book deal
arranged. I know of no author, Stephen King, J.K. Rowling (who
might hold the world's record for making the most money off a
book) has anything like that. Just how in the hell could you
write 500 books. If you wrote one a week, that would take you
around ten years and that doesn't give you much time to eat (or
cook American meals for you friends in foreign countries... see
www.UFOWatchdog.com), or sleep, or engage in secret activities
with your super secret anti-terrorism pals. But, once again, I
digress.

So, once again, I have managed to offend someone in the UFO
community. I have done this before and will probably do it
again. The only way to avoid it is to believe everyone and
everything. Question nothing, no matter how dumb it sounds and
while you'll be treated fairly well inside ufology, those
outside will probably think you're an idiot.



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com