UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > May > May 1

Re: Just A Few Roswell Questions - Kaeser

From: Steven Kaeser <steve.nul>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:18:41 -0400
Fwd Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 07:18:54 -0400
Subject: Re: Just A Few Roswell Questions - Kaeser

>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:19:15 +0200
>Subject: Re: Just A Few Roswell Questions

>>From: Neil Morris <neil.nul>
>>Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 09:13:18 +0100
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Subject: Re: Just A Few Roswell Questions

>>>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:37:50 +0200
>>>Subject: Re: Just A Few Roswell Questions


>>>Jesse Marcel Jr has totally denied seeing in those pictures
>>>any element resembling the symbols he had seen on a beam. After
>>>that false claim made by Bond Johnson, Marcel denied it, and
>>>confirmed that to me.

>>I am aware as to what Jesse Jnr has said in the past in that he
>>never saw any particular symbols familiar to him within the
>>photographs he's seen. I'm not surprised in the least at this
>>as the vast majority of people have only seen the FW photos in
>>either 6x4 style book images or at the best10x8 prints.

>Bond Johnson had sent to Marcel the new, high resolusion,

Hi All,

I believe that Jessie was given large prints from the hi-rez
scans, but you'll find disagreement on how "hi-rez" those scans
were, after being commissioned by Stanton Friedman (if I recall
correctly). Stanton has made those scans available on CD for
anyone who wants to review them, but I know that some have felt
that the scanning process could have been handled differently
and so the debate over quality continues. Neil, correct me if my
memory is in error, but I thought that your "enhancements" of
the images brought out what you've identified as "Symbols", and
I'm not sure that Jessie Jr. was ever shown those images, per

Jessie has looked at the Ramey photographs and simply stated
that the debris show in those photos is not the debris that he
saw in his kitchen. It's as simple as that, and I'm not sure
that Jessie even spent much time looking for symbols if he felt
"up front' that the debris wasn't the same. I'm not sure how he
handles this in his upcoming book, but I suspect it would be
addressed in some way.

Neil, I'm afraid that there's a lot of evidence to indicate that
the debris was switched out completely and that there was no
actual Roswell debris shown in Ramey's office. I believe that
most of the major Roswell investigators believe that the debris
was switched out and all this discussion about "symbols" and
analysis of the debris pictures is a "Red Herring" keeping us
busy. The "Ramey Memo" controversy was interesting, but the
limits of film emulsion and the imagination/confabulation have
led us down a blind alley with no outlet.  IMO, interesting
arguments can be made in favor of both the "Debris" and the
"Memo", but neither lead to a resolution and it ends up being a
matter of what you "believe" to be true, or have proven to
yourself scientifically.


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com