|
From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac.nul> Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 13:15:58 -0400 Fwd Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 11:09:49 -0400 Subject: Re: Detailed UFO Caught On Camera - Maccabee >From: Michael Stimson <Michael001.nul> >To: <ufoupdates.nul>, >Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 14:31:37 +0100 >Subject: Re: Detailed UFO Caught On Camera >>From: Katharina Wilson <K_Wilson.nul> >>To: ufoupdates.nul >>Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 14:13:08 -0500 >>Subject: Re: Detailed UFO Caught On Camera >>Source: NowPublic.Com - Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada >>>http://tinyurl.com/23st9r >>May 21, 2007 >>>[Images at site] >>>Posted by DanB >>>Detailed UFO Caught On Camera >>I've read three different blogs (with pics) regarding this >>object. On a couple of them they said they had done an analysis >>of one of the enlargements and they believed that it was >>PhotoShop-ped. Just an FYI. <snip> >If you take an aeroplane for example, they have numbers on the >tail to identify them. Maybe even USAF on wings, or the circular >targets on UK aeroplanes. Why would an alien craft need to have >symbols or any kind of identification? Who would recognise it? >If one crashed, are Martians going to turn up and take ownership >of it? >For this reason, I think the most recent UFO photographs, whilst >impressive, are hoaxes. There's no reason for them to have >identification on the craft unless they're going to be picked >up. My first impression on seeing these pictures and reading the story attached was this: Are we to believe that this photographer is the first person, in 60 years, to get close enough to a UFO of completely unique shape, to take daylight photos (even from "underneath") that show the construction details? My answer to myself: I don't buy that! Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast See: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp