UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Nov > Nov 3

Re: Nuking The Aliens

From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 09:02:40 EDT
Archived: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 09:50:02 -0400
Subject: Re: Nuking The Aliens


>From: Nick Balaskas <Nikolaos.nul>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 13:51:46 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
>Subject: Re: Nuking The Aliens

>>From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 10:28:58 EDT
>>Subject: Re: Nuking The Aliens

>>>From: Jay Nelson <jnelson.nul>
>>>Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 12:55:15 -0700
>>>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates.nul>
>>>Subject: Nuking The Aliens

>>>Listers,

>>>Last night there was a British science show, Horizon, on PBS
>>>about the causes of gamma ray bursts. Apparently, these strange
>>>explosions were first detected by a US satellite that was - get
>>>this - looking for evidence the Soviets were testing their H-
>>>bombs by blowing them up on the farside of the Moon.

>>That doesn't sound correct.

>>>Now, how absurd is that? Test your bombs by shooting them at
>>>someplace you can't directly observe, don't control, and a risky
>>>quarter of a million miles away???

>>>I'm reminded of the story in the Disclosure book about how we
>>>fired a 100 megaton monster at the Moon at one point supposedly
>>>to show just how bad we were, and that the aliens disarmed it.

>>Nonsense. No such thing ever happened. No 100 MT bomb was ever
>>built let alone launched into a lunar trajectory.

>>>Could we have been actually shooting missiles at the aliens? Or
>>>is that even more absurd?

>>How about checking your sources?


>Hi Brad,

>For someone who I thought would be better informed on such
>matters, I was surprised by your response to Jay that is more
>appropriate for a debunker who does research by proclamation.

>I think it is YOU that should check your sources.

I am not the one who made the undocumented and spurious, as well
as ridiculous claim, about the purported "firing of a 100
megaton monster at the Moon." Those who assert such rabid
nonsense have the obligation to document the claim, not me to
refute it.

>Below is one item mentioned on the UFO UpDates List in support
>of Jay's claims that you may have overlooked.

>http://tinyurl.com/2prqn2

You have enough technical background to know that (a) the
article repeatedly states that no such nuclear weapon was ever
built and fired at the Moon - exactly what I said and what you
now dispute without a shred of credible evidence. And (b) there
is no mention of any "100 megaton monster" H-bomb, only
something in the "Hiroshima" range (15 kiloton yield versus
100,000 kilotons is what 100 megatons converts to
mathematically).




Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/subscribers/


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com