UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Nov > Nov 27

Re: Randle On Haut's Affidavit - Part Two

From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:59:11 +0100
Archived: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:25:14 -0500
Subject: Re: Randle On Haut's Affidavit - Part Two


>From: David Rudiak <drudiak.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:50:09 -0800
>Subject: Re: Randle On Haut's Affidavit - Part Two

>>From: Frank Warren <frank-warren.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 13:14:52 -0800
>>Subject: Re: Randle On Haut's Affidavit - Part Two

>>>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 14:37:01 EST
>>>Subject: Re: Randle On Haut's Affidavit - Part Two

>>>>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
>>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>>Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:23:53 +0100
>>>>Subject: Re: Randle On Haut's Affidavit - Part Two

>>In August 2001 David Rudiak interviewed Walter, recently he
>>(Rudiak) wrote, He claimed he couldn't remember clearly what
>>had happened over 50 years ago and anybody who said they could
>>wasn't being truthful.

>Of course, nobody can remember clearly everything that happened
>50 years before. But that doesn't mean they are suffering from
>dementia.

>I also wrote that when I spoke to Walter in August 2001, I never
>had any sense that he was suffering from dementia, such as
>getting confused with words, having trouble putting sentences
>together, fumbling for answers, etc. He was perfectly coherent.
>Instead, my sense was that he used the old memory comment to
>deflect questions that he didn't want to get into. He also
>wouldn't allow me to tape the conversation, which may have been
>his way of maintaining plausible deniability in case he blurted
>something out that he shouldn't have.

>Now this was almost a year after Wendy and Dennis interviewed
>him. He wasn't a senile old man when I spoke to him, and
>therefore I seriously doubt he was when interviewed earlier.

<snip>

>I think the contradictions were the result of a man very
>reluctant to come forward, and thus full of internal conflicts.

>Ultimately the arbiter of what was revealed was Walter Haut
>himself and Connors, Schmitt, et. al. did the best they knew
>how under the circumstances.


David,

Thank you for your clear and important testimony about talking
with Walter Haut during two hours in 2001.

So, he was not senile at that time, one year after the video.

I think like you that he had a sort of moral conflict between
his wish to talk and his oath to secrecy.

He solved that by signing a document to be published only after
his death.

It would be interestting to have here a comment by Wendy
Connors, if she agrees.

We live in a strange world - we are discussing the testimony of
a man, of obvious integrity, who has revealed that he had seen
an alien craft and an alien body, in Roswell!

Not a little joke, I guess.


Gildas Bourdais



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/subscribers/


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com