UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Oct > Oct 10

Re: Diversity Of UFO Morphology

From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 08:12:21 EDT
Archived: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:50:18 -0400
Subject: Re: Diversity Of UFO Morphology


>From: Michael Tarbell <mtarbell.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 09:52:59 -0600
>Subject: Re: Diversity Of UFO Morphology

>>From: Sergey Shpakovsky <sergejsh.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 12:43:06 -0400 (EDT)
>>Subject: Re: Diversity Of UFO Morphology

>>>From: Michael Tarbell <mtarbell.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:23:01 -0600
>>>Subject: Diversity Of UFO Morphology [was: Once More The Term 'Flying Saucers']

<snip>

>>>If we restrict the question to the photographic evidence alone,
>>>and even to 'saucer-like' objects, can anyone cite a pair of
>>>photos from independent sightings that depict objects that are
>>>a clear geometric match? If indeed there are none, is this not
>>>puzzling?

<snip>

>Thanks for the links, they help illustrate my point. They are
>all indeed 'saucer-like', and yet all have different shapes
>(although I must say that the Heflin and the Zywieckie Lake
>objects are fairly similar).

>If we imagine randomly selecting and photographing fish from the
>ocean, of course we would find a wide variety of types, perhaps
>all different at first. But eventually you expect to find a pair
>of photos that both show, say, a yellowfin tuna.

Battelle Memorial Institute did a statistical study of Project
Blue Book's case files which among other things attempted to
develop a "model" of classes of UFO shapes. This became the Blue
Book Special Report 14 released in October 1955.

In reality Battelle was trying to debunk UFO's as merely
disparate random misperceptions which would of course result in
no consistent pattern. And they falsely insinuated that all they
could do was come up with 12 different UFO shapes, when even
they admitted there were several similar shapes that could be
grouped together out of the 12. Rather than repeat their 4 shape
categories which are somewhat erroneous, let me just list the
most obvious shape correlations:

Aircraft-type shape (Cases 2 and 3)
Bulbous rocket shape (Cases 4 and 5)
Helmet or hat-shaped saucer (Cases 6 and 8)


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/subscribers/


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com