UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Oct > Oct 14

Re: Boston's Own Robot-Plane Skunk Works

From: John Scheldroup <johnscheldroup.nul>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:59:06 -0500
Archived: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 22:16:08 -0400
Subject: Re: Boston's Own Robot-Plane Skunk Works


>From: Sergey Shpakovsky <sergejsh.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 16:02:58 -0400 (EDT)
>Subject: Re: Boston's Own Robot-Plane Skunk Works

>>From: John Scheldroup <johnscheldroup.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:58:40 -0500
>>Subject: Re: Boston's Own Robot-Plane Skunk Works

>>>From: Sergey Shpakovsky <sergejsh.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 13:51:41 -0400 (EDT)
>>>Subject: Re: Boston's Own Robot-Plane Skunk Works

><snip>

>>>- When object started to go straight up, "flame was light blue
>>>and at bottom was sort of orange color", and "no smoke". There
>>>is a little similarity in color with jet engine, for example:

>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Engine.f15.arp.750pix.jpg

>>>But I don't see orange color there.

>>LOX/Alcohol EZ Rocket Engine

>>http://science.howstuffworks.com/ez-rocket1.htm

>http://www.xcor.com/products/engines/4A3_LOX_alcohol_rocket_engine.html

><snip>

>Yes, but there is more pink than orange. But maybe it is just
>how photo shows colors?

>But this detail from Zamorra report describes similar feature of
>flame:

>"It was a narrow type of flame. It was like a "stream down"--a
>funnel type--narrower at top than at bottom. Flame possibly 3
>degrees or so in width--not wide."

>Also question - jet engines at that time was the same as on
>these pictures?

>And still unclear, if this was jet engine how suddenly "there
>was no roar"? "It disappeared as it went over the mountain. It
>had no flame whatsoever as it was traveling over the ground, and
>no smoke or noise."

>>Symbol

>>http://www.symbols.com/encyclopedia/04/0423.html

>>This sign from the ground-to-air emergency code means I/we
>>proceed in this direction according to some sources. It is also
>>a main part of the sign, reported to have been seen in 1964 by
>>a man from Socorro, New Mexico, as a sort of logotype on an
>>elliptical, unidentified flying object, i.e. a UFO.

>>http://www.symbols.com/encyclopedia/04/0430.html

>>This sign is used in the ground-to-air emergency code to signify
>>that a take-off will be attempted. The meaning is expressed by
>>combining one of the signs for the ground, with, the sign for
>>direction upward.

>>http://www.symbols.com/encyclopedia/02/021.html

>>Sky

>Symbol, which describes Zamorra, more looks like airplane, than
>arrow. On picture in this page Zamorra's symbol is above all
>another symbols:

>http://www.nicap.org/zamora4.htm

>Also, is this combination of "ark", "ground" and arrow, in red
>color, used somewhere on aviation?


Sergey,

If we try and interpret the meaining about the symbols
construction but using the symbols above, by human standards,
when the symbols are joined together we should get a new symbol
that looks like this. The octagon is a frame of reference.. no
part to Zamora's actual sighting ?.

http://home.comcast.net/~johnscheldroup/082207/jpeg/zamora/symbol.htm


John


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/subscribers/


[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp


Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com