UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Oct > Oct 19

Re: Is Ufology 'Anti-Science'?

From: Eleanor White <eleanor.nul>
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 16:03:01 -0400
Archived: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:10:02 -0400
Subject: Re: Is Ufology 'Anti-Science'?

>From: Gerald O'Connell <gac.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 02:20:27 +0100
>Subject: Re: Is Ufology 'Anti-Science'?


>Sorry Eleanor, but this kind of argument only starts to get any
>traction in the minds of the most uncritically USA-centric of

>Why should the whole of the rest of the world bend both its media
>and academic structures out of shape in order to go along with an
>American desire to retain a secret monopoly on alien technology
>retrieved at Roswell?

I don't know the inner workings of the world's power structure,
but it is obvious to me there is a cover up.

> Why doesn't Castro's Cuba embarrass the NSA
>by offering university degrees in Ufology in the same way that it
>embarrasses the USA by offering high quality cut-price medical
>degrees to impoverished American students? - The list of awkward
>questions like this is as genuinely endless as America is

My guess would be the usual list of things that influence
people, threats, bribes and blackmail. I'm sure every world
leader is compromised in some way.

>In short, the argument is far more narrow-minded than any
>supposed suppression of scientific truth on the part of the
>secrecy conspirators upon whose far-reaching actions it depends.
>They can bribe/influence Fox, ABC etc., but China? Iran? India?
>Russia? Venezuela? France? For sixty years?

Yessir. It is obvious to me.

>Are they all queuing up to do the bidding of the Secrecy Group
>and make sure that their limbo lighting meets standards of spooky
>luminescence set by the Pentagon?

I don't know the details of the control mechanisms, though my
experiences as a 27-year target of organized stalking
(COINTELPRO-like) and electronic harassment (something like some
of the MKULTRA programs) certainly have given me some clues.

All I do know is that the incredible consistency and sometimes
clumsiness (like the 'explanations' officially tendered for the
Roswell incidents) are facts that anyone can see. Anyone, that
is, who isn't terrified of the idea that governments can be
massively criminal. I've met many who are.

In our group of organized stalking/electronic harassment
targets, we have new people who simply can't see the many
government crimes in plain sight (which I won't debate here) at
first, because of their assumption that "government just
wouldn't do that." So your similar apparent position is not a
surprise to me.

The assumption that 'government just wouldn't do that' may stem
from failure to reflect that governments are made up of human
beings with human failings and vulnerabilities, and that
'wearing two faces' is what many people do all the time.

In fact, I doubt if there is anyone on the planet who has
reached adulthood, is not developmentally challenged, that
doesn't wear more than one face.

>How long before somebody is trying to persuade us that the (most
>recent) invasion of Iraq was really precipitated by Saddam
>Hussein's intention to make an impartial documentary about
>Roswell, or to offer doctorates in the Ufological Sciences at
>Baghdad Technical Institute?

I've never thought that or made such a claim. Doesn't seem to
bear on the obvious cover up of UFO information.

Eleanor White

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com