UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Oct > Oct 27

Re: Leir Turns Believers Into Sceptics

From: William Sawers <ufsyntax.nul>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:01:55 +1000
Archived: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:42:47 -0400
Subject: Re: Leir Turns Believers Into Sceptics

>From: Gildas Bourdais <bourdais.gildas.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:47:06 +0200
>Subject: Re: Leir Turns Believers Into Sceptics

>>From: William Sawers <ufsyntax.nul>
>>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>>Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:01:25 +1000
>>Subject: Re: Leir Turns Believers Into Sceptics


>>I agree, S Blanch is obviously swayed by Leirs first book which
>>hit the market after his remarkable claims of alien implant
>>removals. I do recall a TV doco about Leir speaking of what had
>>been found as _normal_ anomalies_ often found in humans which
>>can get covered with a coating supplied by the body as a means
>>of stopping infection, if the object couldn't be ejected

>>I've had experience with something similar when my wife had an
>>inch long sewing needle removed from her knee seven years after
>>kneeling on it. This broken needle was offered to us as a
>>souvenir after the surgery and it looked _nothing_ recognizable
>>as a broken sewing needle, it looked more like a "matchstick".
>>Very similar to pics I've seen of Leirs objects. I'm sorry but
>>Leir just doesn't cut it for me either, so John shall we
>>migrate north or south for the winter?


>I have some trouble trying to grasp what you are saying. Do you
>mean that you saw Roger Leir explain on TV that he had found,
>in fact, normal objects, with just a coating stopping infection?
>If Roger Leir said that, and nothing else, it would mean that he
>is a total idiot to believe he had removed a dozen anomalous

>Is that what you mean?


Sorry, as we had spoken privately I had missed your reply on
this List, so I'll just repeat what we have already discussed.

No, it's not what I meant and I meant no disrespect to Dr Leir
personally so if that came across it wasn't intentional. As
regards to the documentary it was what another Dr said as an
explanation for the objects removed by Dr Leir in a documentary
about his claims.

My example of a true experience was just emphasizing my belief
there could be more mundane causes for these anomalies and the
'needle' in my wifes knee changed its appearance after being in
her body for near seven years.

I'm sure Dr Leir is a nice bloke and even sincere, but imo he
hasn't shown much in the way of proof for his extrodinary

(Excuse my grammar in the original reply).



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com