UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Sep > Sep 4

Re: New Revelations On The Origins Of MJ-12

From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 04:51:00 EDT
Archived: Tue, 04 Sep 2007 08:04:33 -0400
Subject: Re: New Revelations On The Origins Of MJ-12

>From: Gerald O'Connell <gac.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 23:57:47 +0100
>Subject: Re: New Revelations On The Origins Of MJ-12

>>From: Brad Sparks <RB47x.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 16:39:06 EDT
>>Subject: Re: New Revelations On The Origins Of MJ-12

>>>From: Gerald O'Connell <gac.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2007 15:24:54 +0100
>>>Subject: Re: New Revelations On The Origins Of MJ-12

>>>- Why in hell, if they wanted serious investigation of the MJ-
>>>12/Roswell issue, whistle-blowers wouldn't send their stuff to
>>>Len Stringfield instead of to a cast of characters who belong in
>>>a made-for-cable comedy about wannabe government agents?

>>You've got to be kidding? Stringfield? Why in hell wouldn't
>>genuine leakers (there is no wrongdoing involved so no "whistle-
>>blowing") go to the NY Times??

>I take your point as to the distinction, but I'm assuming that
>some breach of secrecy would be involved in any major
>revelation, and that this would constitute wrongdoing in the
>legal sense.

Whistleblowers aren't blowing the whistle on their _own_ alleged
"wrongdoing" of revealing secret info. Whistleblowers blow the
whistle on crimes and misdeeds of their employers.

Leaking alleged stories of saucer retrievals is a leak, not
blowing the whistle on some crime. What crime under the law is
it for the government to cover up UFO info when the government
can claim national security laws and state secrets privileges?

This distinction is deliberately confused by disinformers who
want some measure of credibility to attach to the liars who put
forth this drivel, which sounds better if they are labeled
"whistleblowers" performing some service to society possibly at
some personal risk. Whereas "leakers" sound like gossipers and
snitches, a rather different connotation.

>>go to the NY Times?? The fact they don't tells you
>>they aren't genuine leakers, but plants, agents provocateur,
>>agents peddling disinformation.

>Brad, you know as well as anybody that that the NY Times would
>be highly unlikely to publish such material.

The NY Times has prominently covered the very story at issue
here, the alleged MJ-12 documents and so has the Washington
Post. The Post has had reporters fairly sympathetic to UFO
stories over the years. Florida Today has had reporter Billy Cox
covering UFO stories including Roswell and coverup stories for
years until recently, and Cox's stories got national coverage.

A genuine leaker would be insane to go to some fringe UFO
personality to leak his info. What the hell would be the point?
That's like throwing the info in the trash.

Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com