UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Sep > Sep 23

Re: 'American Spy Satellite Downed In Peru'?

From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul>
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:49:49 EDT
Archived: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:05:51 -0400
Subject: Re: 'American Spy Satellite Downed In Peru'?

>From: James Horak <jchorak7441.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 07:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
>Subject: Re: 'American Spy Satellite Downed In Peru'?

>>From: Richard Hall <dh12.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:31:54 -0400
>>Subject: Re: 'American Spy Satellite Downed In Peru'?


>>As predicted, a wealth of slipping and sliding, and slithering,
>>and not one iota of evidence.

>>Among other things, I have in my possession a fake W-2 form
>>claimed by Lazar as proof of his employment by the Navy.

>>Unfortunately for him I had access to lots of relevant reference
>>volumes, and (1) no such Navy office existed, and (2) the Zip
>>Code on the W-2 form never existed. But I understand that faith-
>>based belief is unassailable.

>Why, Mr. Hall, because you say so? You have less credibility
>with me than does Lazar. I'll tell you why, because there's
>always more significance to what you choose to ignore than what
>you address.

>Forging a government document and a publisher allowing it in a
>book, making no determination of its authenticity, without any
>serious repercussion and under the circumstances of its
>sensational subject matter...why isn't Mr. Lazar in jail if what
>you say is true? If the government chose not to do its duty, the
>publisher damn well would. All silence though, just like you on
>that point.

Good Day, All -

If I might butt in here. What makes you think that the publisher
cares if the documents are faked or authentic? What makes you
think they even care?

With most books published, you must sign a statement that
absolves the publisher of all responsibility for what you write.
Some require releases for photographs, again for their
protection against lawsuit rather than a need for authenticity.

So, the fact the publisher has done nothing about this means
nothing. As long as the publisher isn't sued, he or she cares
nothing for the truth and authenticity. Just take a look at some
of the nonsense that gets published today. And it matters not
which side of the political spectrum you reside, you can find
examples from the other that are obviously untrue, but published
they are.

Believe what you will, there is no way that two completely
opposite points can be correct, and yet both are published for a
specific audience.

And now I bow out of this discussion... unless, of course, I feel
the urge to say something more.


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com