UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Sep > Sep 26

Forged Documents [was: 'American Spy Satellite

From: James Horak <jchorak7441.nul>
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Archived: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:49:51 -0400
Subject: Forged Documents [was: 'American Spy Satellite

>From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 13:49:49 EDT
>Subject: Re: 'American Spy Satellite Downed In Peru'?

>>From: James Horak <jchorak7441.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 07:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
>>Subject: Re: 'American Spy Satellite Downed In Peru'?

>>>From: Richard Hall <dh12.nul>
>>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>>Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 17:31:54 -0400
>>>Subject: Re: 'American Spy Satellite Downed In Peru'?


>>>As predicted, a wealth of slipping and sliding, and slithering,
>>>and not one iota of evidence.

>>>Among other things, I have in my possession a fake W-2 form
>>>claimed by Lazar as proof of his employment by the Navy.

>>>Unfortunately for him I had access to lots of relevant reference
>>>volumes, and (1) no such Navy office existed, and (2) the Zip
>>>Code on the W-2 form never existed. But I understand that faith-
>>>based belief is unassailable.

>>>Bob Hall

>>Why, Mr. Hall, because you say so? You have less credibility
>>with me than does Lazar. I'll tell you why, because there's
>>always more significance to what you choose to ignore than what
>>you address.

>>Forging a government document and a publisher allowing it in a
>>book, making no determination of its authenticity, without any
>>serious repercussion and under the circumstances of its
>>sensational subject matter...why isn't Mr. Lazar in jail if what
>>you say is true? If the government chose not to do its duty, the
>>publisher damn well would. All silence though, just like you on
>>that point.



>If I might butt in here. What makes you think that the publisher
>cares if the documents are faked or authentic? What makes you
>think they even care?

Pardon me, Mr. Randle, let's try employing a little more power
of discernment, shall we? We're not talking about a shopping
list from the Dead Sea Scrolls, a birthday card alledged to have
been sent from Elizabeth Barret Browning to a lover while her
husband was still alive, or a new Lincoln letter firing his
Minister of War, Stanton, found in a box of Cracker Jacks.

We are talking about what has been alledged to be a forged
government document, published as authentic by the very person
to which it first-hand pertains and who has thus placed
themselves in direct conflict with both federal criminal
statute, civil liability and in short, having their behind hung
out to dry on just about every level future aspirations might

And there are no criminal proceedings. (How little that would
take to convict _if_ Lazar was lying.)

And you're going to tell me a publishing house has no stake in
the veracity of what they publish?

Yes, a little more discernment, please.


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com