UFO UpDates
A mailing list for the study of UFO-related phenomena
'Its All Here In Black & White'
Location: UFOUpDatesList.Com > 2007 > Sep > Sep 27

Re: 'Hobbit' Not Human Scientists Say

From: Steve Sawyer <stevesaw.nul>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:50:20 -0700
Archived: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:31:47 -0400
Subject: Re: 'Hobbit' Not Human Scientists Say

>From: Paul Scott Anderson <paulscottanderson.nul>
>To: ufoupdates.nul
>Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:06:02 -0700
>Subject: Re: 'Hobbit' Not Human Scientists Say

>>From: Gerald O'Connell <gac.nul>
>>To: ufoupdates.nul
>>Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:57:32 +0100
>>Subject: Re: 'Hobbit' Not Human Scientists Say

>>I'll vote for that, and I bet Jerry would too. It's just that
>>this isn't the right place to have that discussion. A mountain
>>of work needs to be done, mainly by suitably qualified people,
>>on the significance of this finding before it gets anywhere
>>close it where it might have any relevance to UFOs.

>True. My only point was that it is an interesting finding, in
>response to Jerry's dismissive reply to Greg.

Hi, Paul, Listerions,

Not only interesting, but a small granule of fact that, if the
'hobbit' hominid, which is now known as a different species on
the branching tree of human evolution than homo sapiens sapiens,
that Mac Tonnies conjecture of a possible cryptoterrestrial
ancestor may also have some validity, as the 'hobbit' hominid
dates back to only 18,000 years ago.

Of course, this is provocative, and food for thought, although,
alternatively, since the 'hobbits' were still using fairly
primitive stone tools at the 18K year mark, it obviously does
not connote an 'advanced' non-sapiens species ancestor.

Curious, nonetheless.


Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast



[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |

UFO UpDates Main Index

UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp

Archive programming by Glenn Campbell at Glenn-Campbell.com