From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul>
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:52:20 +0100
Archived: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:48:56 -0400
Subject: Re: Is Ufology 'Anti-Science'?


>From: Isaac Koi <isaackoi.nul>
>To: <ufoupdates.nul>
>Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:27:41 +0100
>Subject: Is Ufology 'Anti-Science'?

>Quite a few questions are posed below. Obviously, I don't expect
>many of you to have the time or inclination to give your views
>in relation to most of these questions - but it would be helpful
>to me if you could select a question you consider interesting
>and give a brief comment.

<snip>

>Is ufology either a "pseudo-science" or "anti-science"? If you
>think so, why? If not, why are such views expressed?

>What does it mean to you to be "scientific"?

>Is it a good thing to be "scientific"?

>Do you think levels of antiscientific/pseudoscientific views are
>increasing?

<snip>

Hi Isaac

Think that question epitomizes the mis-understandings about both
science and about ufology.

Science is all about logical questioning, so is ufology;
therefore ufology is science.

Mind you there's two approaches - "Advances are made by
answering questions - Discoveries are made by questioning
answers"


Cheers

Ray D



Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast

See:

http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/