|
From: Ray Dickenson <r.dickenson.nul> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:52:20 +0100 Archived: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:48:56 -0400 Subject: Re: Is Ufology 'Anti-Science'? >From: Isaac Koi <isaackoi.nul> >To: <ufoupdates.nul> >Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 22:27:41 +0100 >Subject: Is Ufology 'Anti-Science'? >Quite a few questions are posed below. Obviously, I don't expect >many of you to have the time or inclination to give your views >in relation to most of these questions - but it would be helpful >to me if you could select a question you consider interesting >and give a brief comment. <snip> >Is ufology either a "pseudo-science" or "anti-science"? If you >think so, why? If not, why are such views expressed? >What does it mean to you to be "scientific"? >Is it a good thing to be "scientific"? >Do you think levels of antiscientific/pseudoscientific views are >increasing? <snip> Hi Isaac Think that question epitomizes the mis-understandings about both science and about ufology. Science is all about logical questioning, so is ufology; therefore ufology is science. Mind you there's two approaches - "Advances are made by answering questions - Discoveries are made by questioning answers" Cheers Ray D Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast See: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp