From: Eleanor White <ewraven1.nul> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:00:31 -0400 Archived: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:26:47 -0400 Subject: Re: Boomerang UFO? >From: Lyle Michel <ljm1915.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:45:35 -0700 >Subject: Boomerang UFO? <snip> >I would like to suggest that our government is likely using >antigravitational craft to put satellites in orbit. I don't hear >or read about many rocket launches of satellites and yet we have >hundreds if not thousands in orbit. How did they all get up >there? >Lyle Michel I've wondered from time to time about something. Fairly early in the U.S. space program, we would often hear of military satellite launches from the _west_ coast, i.e. Vandenburg Air Force Base. As best I understand the reason for the East coast location of Cape Kennedy/Canaveral was that they could launch _with_ the rotation of the Earth, assisting in reaching orbital velocity. _And_ the Atlantic Ocean was a safe place for failed launches to crash in. Failed Vandenburg launches would crash into the U.S., not an ideal situation, it would seem. I wondered why the safe crash zone idea wasn't considered important for the military launches. A tie to anti-grav technology is way too tenuous to be made seriously, but I still wonder why the military satellite launches were made on the West coast, with the seeming hazard of crashes into the U.S. Eleanor White Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp