From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 18:35:34 +0000 Archived: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:21:03 -0400 Subject: Re: Shostak's Search Shift? >Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:36:37 -0400 >To: ufo-updates-list.nul >From: post.nul >Subject: UFO UpDate: Re: Shostak's Search Shift? >From: Stanton Friedman <fsphys.nul> >To: post.nul >Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 16:13:33 -0700 (PDT) >Subject: Re: Shostak's Search Shift? <snip> >I believe I have also done more than anybody else to show that >numerous so called MJ-12 documents are frauds. I espouse 3 and >possibly SOM 1.01 . I can find no good reason for you or any >body else to talk of initial ones as frauds. Can you? <snip> Stan: I have read everything I could find where you comment on MJ-12 documents. I even cite the sources in my book. However, I can't decide, based on the attached e-mail, whether you are claiming the documents are frauds or not. I was taught, at University, that logically something is or is not. How can the documents both be frauds and not frauds? Maybe, in some weird Boorlean universe that might be true, but not in this agreed upon reality. KK Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp