From: Stanton T. Friedman <fsphys.nul> Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:35:17 -0300 Archived: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:53:49 -0400 Subject: Re: MJ-12 Redux >From: Kathy Kasten <catraja.nul> >To: <post.nul> >Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 15:51:11 +0000 >Subject: Re: MJ-12 Redux >From: Kevin Randle <KRandle993.nul> >To: post.nul> >Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:09:10 EDT >Subject: Re: MJ-12 Redux >From: Stanton Friedman <fsphys.nul> >To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <post.nul> >Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 06:08:58 -0700 (PDT) >Subject: Re: MJ-12 Redux ><snip> >ST Friedman >[Exposer of false arguments against the validity of the EBD,TF, >and CT and provider of proof that there are a bunch of false MJ- >12 docs. Also not an acceptor of the false doctrine that Absence >of evidence is Evidence of absence.] >I wonder if you shouldn't say [Peddler of false arguments for...] >And finally, there comes a point when absence of evidence is, in >fact evidence of absence. You've had decades to produce some >evidence for the authenticity of the MJ-12 documents, mentions >in other, real documents, notes by all those people whose papers >you've inspected, and there is still not a single corroborating >document. Nothing. Absence of evidence is finally evidence of >absence. >BTW; I notice there hasn't been a rush to join this conversation >which tells me there is little interest in this. I just thought >another point of view should be expressed. > >Thanks Kevin for providing another opinion regarding the so- >called MJ-12 documents. > >I would guess nobody joined in the discussion because most of us >had thought the debate was over. Ending with the conclusion that >the documents were fakes. Clever, very detailed, but fakes. That >would include the 'newer' even more detailed MJ-12 fakes. >I thought the "newer" version of all those many documents were >truly very funny and done by someone with a sense of humor. >Those documents were the "wet dream" of some ufo investigators. >Everything one ever wanted to be true about ufos was "proved" to >be true by those documents. Kathy, You are asking the wrong question. It is not are the MJ-12 documents fakes. It is "are any genuine?". I have, of course, long since noted that a mess were fakes and spelled out the reasons.I say three(3) are genuine and spelled out in detail why I reached that conclusion Check the long article on my website. Are isotopes fissionable? Of course not. Everybody Knows that 99% are not. Fortunately, there are a couple that are. Would anybody be surprised if the government flooded the market With junk after the original genuine ones were slipped out? They were obviously successful in getting the garbage to rub off on the good stuff. For shame for being so gullible. Stan Friedman Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp