From: William Treurniet <wtreurniet.nul> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 22:37:18 -0500 Archived: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:08:06 -0500 Subject: Rendlesham Case Related To Later Crop Formations I recently updated a report written last year about a logical relationship that exists among the 1980 Rendlesham Forest UFO event, the 2002 Crabwood crop formation, and the 2010 Wilton Windmill crop formation. Each event provided a set of binary data that was decoded by a single image decoding algorithm also found in the Wilton Windmill formation. The meaningfulness of each resulting image is subjective, but most people should find the images easy to recognize. Because the resolution is so low, more than a passing glance may be required in some cases. I concede that acceptance of my conclusions depends on agreement that the images are recognizable. Then, I would argue that the probability of six recognizable images by chance is low, so they were, therefore, intentionally encoded. The updated article includes an appendix showing examples of images decoded using different offsets from the beginnings of two of the data sets. The patterns in these images are meaningless compared to the patterns with zero offset. This would be expected if the patterns with zero offset were the intended images. Since the decoding algorithm was specified only in the latest data set, the agency that made it must have created the two earlier data sets as well. This is important because it means that there was a larger agenda behind the individual events. Whoever was behind the plan to communicate the images had access to very sophisticated resources. One event demonstrated anomalous flight technologies and/or methods to control perception of reality (Rendlesham Forest). Another event required sophisticated techniques for constructing a complex crop formation (Crabwood), and another required a method for encoding multiple images in the same set of data, even with severe constraints on bit assignments (Wilton Windmill). The existence of the related images from the three events says that some agency meant to use them to accomplish a larger objective. The argument is made that the images are a request for a friendly personal encounter with us. This interpretation is based on both the specific content and the general nature of the images. The originators of this request are most likely non- human, probably non-terrestrial. Such a request from a human agency would be trivial and unlikely to have taken 30 years to communicate. The article was submitted for publication to the Journal of Scientific Exploration, and was rejected. The reviewer concluded that "the links to other formations, the blurry 'decoded' images, and the information from Rendlesham (itself a very controversial case) don't offer sufficient linkage or proof of other anomalies, and certainly not a long-term plan. There is far too much speculation and stretching of the available evidence, which is not the right approach for a scientific paper. I'm sure this article would do well in a crop circle journal, but it doesn't have the substance for JSE". I mention the reviewer's response so you will know at least one academic's opinion if/when you read the article. My impression is that the reviewer seemed unwilling to accept that the images are meaningful (note the comment about blurry 'decoded' images). In retrospect, their meaningfulness might have been more convincing if a distribution of responses to the images from multiple observers had been included. The review also shows that interesting results in this field are not easy to publish in peer-reviewed journals, even in the less restrictive JSE. Perhaps the analyses in the article are indeed not appropriate for a science journal. The process was more like solving a mystery than a simple hypothesize and test procedure. But if the images really do represent a request for a friendly meeting with us, that message might be time-sensitive. Therefore, the updated article was added to the viXra archive for immediate review by anyone. It is available at the following address. http://vixra.org/abs/1112.0050 Best, William Listen to 'Strange Days... Indeed' - The PodCast At: http://www.virtuallystrange.net/ufo/sdi/program/ These contents above are copyright of the author and UFO UpDates - Toronto. They may not be reproduced without the express permission of both parties and are intended for educational use only.
[ Next Message | Previous Message | This Day's Messages ]
This Month's Index |
UFO UpDates - Toronto - Operated by Errol Bruce-Knapp